Abstract
Using the deficit theory, this article explored whether race, age, and gender are determining factors leading to attrition. The study followed a qualitative methodological approach. Data were generated through telephonic and focus-group interviews. To identify suitable honours students who dropped out, the snowball sampling technique was used. Sixteen participants were selected purposively and interviewed. While six of them participated in a focus group, 10 were interviewed telephonically. Findings divulged that many of the students who further their studies in open distance e-learning institutions experience a range of challenges, which, in due course, lead to attrition. Lecturers’ failure to provide feedback on time, amongst other reasons for attrition, was cited as a serious determining factor. Although preceding studies have unveiled that race, age, and gender contribute towards student attrition in higher education, this inquiry uncovered that such is not always the case. To effectively respond to the needs causing attrition, students and lecturers must address these challenges that they encounter in teaching and learning. It is, therefore, of paramount importance to develop and implement training programmes for students and lecturers on aspects such as time management, managing their workload, and encouraging lecturers to provide feedback on time to the students concerned.
Reference43 articles.
1. Bartram, B. 2013. “Brits Abroad: The Perceived Support Needs of UK Learners Studying in Higher Education Overseas.” Journal of Studies in International Education 17 (1): 5–18. Accessed February 13, 2024. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258157797_Brits_Abroad_The_Perceived_Support_Needs_of_UK_Learners_Studying_in_Higher_Education_Overseas; https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315311436085
2. Bognár, L. 2024. “Predicting Student Attrition in University Courses.” In Machine Learning in Educational Sciences: Approaches, Applications and Advances, 129–157. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9379-6_8
3. Council on Higher Education (CHE). 2010. “Access and Throughput in South African Education: Three Case Studies.” Higher Education Monitor, 9 March. Accessed March 15, 2024. https://www.che.ac.za/sites/default/files/publications/Higher_Education_Monitor_9.pdf
4. Dekker, G. W., M. Pechenizkiy, and J. M. Vleeshouwers. 2009. “Predicting Students Drop Out: A Case Study.” International Working Group on Educational Data Mining. Educational Data Mining (EDM). Cordoba, Spain, July 1–3, 2009. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining. Accessed April 22, 2024. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221570467_Predicting_Students_Drop_Out_A_Case_Study
5. Department of Research: Institutional Research (DISA). 2015. “2014 Unisa Dropout Survey.” University of South Africa, 1–37.