Awareness and Usage of Information Retrieval Functionalities Found in the Online Public Access Catalogue by Undergraduates at the University of Venda

Author:

Shokane MashiaORCID,Bopape Solomon Tsekere

Abstract

Calls for a shift from the Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC) to discovery systems craft a need for recognising the information-searching behaviour of the current genre of library users. This study examined the undergraduate students’ awareness and usage of information search functionalities that are embedded in OPAC at the University of Venda (UNIVEN) in Limpopo Province, South Africa (SA). Quantitative data were collected using a Google Form questionnaire, the link of which was e-mailed to the participants to complete. A systematic random sampling method was applied to arrive at 563 respondents. The findings revealed that most respondents rated their level of awareness of OPAC as average. Although some were familiar with OPAC search functionalities, such as author-and-title search entries, and preferred using simple search options on OPAC, there were respondents who were not familiar with Boolean operators, truncation and wildcard symbols, proximity operators, and field search. The major variables affecting their information retrieval on OPAC were poor internet connection and their lack of skills in searching for information from OPAC. This study recommends that librarians promote the importance of using all OPAC functionalities and train undergraduates to improve their awareness and optimal usage of OPAC.

Publisher

UNISA Press

Subject

Metals and Alloys,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials

Reference68 articles.

1. Abera, G. 2019. “Web Information Seeking Behaviour of Academic Staff: In Case of Assosa University.” International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Development 2 (5): 706–720.

2. Adeleke, D. S., and E. N. Emeahara. 2016. “Relationship between Information Literacy and Use of Electronic Information Resources by Postgraduate Students of the University of Ibadan.” Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal): 1381. Accessed April 20, 2021. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1381.

3. Adeyemi, I. O., and K. Omopupa. 2020. “Moving from OPAC to Discovery Systems: Nigerian Librarians’ Perceived Knowledge and Readiness.” Cataloguing and Classification Quarterly 58 (2): 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1715520.

4. Aju, D. T., and S. T. Foti. 2020. “Undergraduates’ Awareness, Utilization and Satisfaction with Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC) in Public University Libraries in Nasarawa State, Nigeria.” Library and Information Perspectives and Research 2 (1): 18–29. https://doi.org/10.47524/liprv2i1.2.

5. Arshad, A., and F. Shafique. 2014. “What Do Users Prefer, Card Catalogue or OPAC? A Study of Punjab University Library.” The Electronic Library 32 (3): 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-07-2012-0093.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3