A Model to Foster Records Use in Evidence-Based Decision-Making: Neither Restricted by Time nor Space

Author:

Momoti Nikiwe,King Lizette

Abstract

The study is derived from a doctoral dissertation by Momoti that triangulated the Continuum of Evidence Use and the Records Continuum Models to determine the extent to which records as sources of evidence were used for evidence-based decision-making by senior managers in Western Cape governmental bodies in South Africa. The investigation was descriptive, cross-sectional, and used a mixed-mode survey design. The mixed-mode survey addressed low response challenges encountered during data collection. Data was collected from a stratified random sample of 163 senior managers from 31 Western Cape governmental bodies. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to ensure that an accurate description of the findings was achieved. The study revealed that knowledge of evidence sources is crucial for their use. Senior managers acknowledged the importance of using records for evidence-based decision-making and always used them as sources of evidence to decide on service delivery programmes. The study revealed 83 such service delivery improvement programmes. The study proposed a model to foster the use of records as sources of evidence in decision-making.

Publisher

UNISA Press

Subject

General Medicine

Reference47 articles.

1. Acland, G. 1992. “Managing the Record Rather Than the Relic.” Archives and Manuscripts 20 (1): 58–62.

2. Alalwan, J. A., M. A. Thomas, and H. R. Weistroffer. 2014. “Decision Support Capabilities of Enterprise Content Management Systems: An Empirical Investigation.” Decision Support Systems 68: 39–48.

3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2010. A Guide for Using Statistics for Evidence-Based Policy. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics. Accessed December 8, 2021. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/1500.0.

4. Balnaves, M., and P. Caputi. 2001. Introduction to Quantitative Research Methods: An

5. Investigative Approach. London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209380.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3