Abstract
Historically, grammarians have viewed tenses as simple, unanalysable pieces of grammatical information. Portmanteau tenses may combine tense, aspect, and modality, but these are the main categories. Suzanne Fleischman has proposed a radically new paradigm in which not only verbal forms but entire discourse contexts are analysed as clusters of oppositional properties to which markedness values apply. It is in the interaction of the cluster of properties associated with a verbal form and those associated with its discourse context that we find the locus of verbal meaning. This interactive meaning is illustrated by examples from Psalm 18, demonstrating that morphological forms have the effect of either drawing non-prototypical situations closer to the prototype or drawing situations farther away from the prototype.
Reference54 articles.
1. Al-Heeh, S. 2020. “Affiliations of Verb Tense, Sentence Pattern and Language Style Shifts in the Noble Qur’an: Some Deep Linguistic Intuitiveness.” IAR Journal of Humanities and Social Science 1 (3): 144–55.
2. Andersen, Henning. 2001. “Markedness and the Theory of Linguistic Change.” In Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progress, edited by Henning Andersen, 21-57. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.219.02and
3. Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Comrie, B. 1985. Tense. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Cook, J. A. 2012. Time and the Biblical Hebrew Verb: The Expression of Tense, Aspect, and Modality in Biblical Hebrew. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781575066813