Abstract
Micah 2:2 condemns the injustice of land grabbing in eighth-century Israel. Contrary to the traditional perception that each clan’s land belonged to it as a permanent inheritance, by the eighth century BCE land had become a commodity that could be bought and sold, or even seized. The article examines Micah 2:2 in the context of public elections in Nigeria where, having been pauperised by the ruling class, the electorate yield themselves to politicians who exploit them to keep themselves in power. Employing the historical-critical and descriptive methods, the article concludes that the Micah passage speaks to the Nigerian context in the sense that just as the economic exploitation of the peasant farmers violated the theocratic order, in Nigeria this attitude is inimical to democratic rule and the good of the people.
Reference71 articles.
1. Ademiluka, S. O. 2007. “Prophetic Intervention in Eighth-Century Israel: A Recipe for Socio-Economic Recovery in Africa.” Uma: Journal of Philosophy and Religious Studies 2 (2): 24–37.
2. Ademiluka, S. O. 2015. “A Narrative Reading of Exodus 1–12 as a Challenge to the Church in Nigeria.” Uma: Journal of Philosophy and Religious Studies 10: 13–33.
3. Ademiluka, S. O. 2016. “Marginalisation and Electoral Violence: Interpreting the Secession Narrative (1 Kings 12:1-24) in Nigerian Context.” In The Bible and Violence in Africa: Bible in Africa Studies 20, edited by J. Kugler, L. Tagarasei, and M. R. Gunda, 117–32. Bamberg: University Press.
4. Ademiluka, S. O. 2017. “Justice and Righteousness in Old Testament Prophets in Relation to Insecurity in Nigeria.” Journal for Semitics 26 (1): 294–316. https://doi.org/10.25159/1013-8471/3118
5. Ademiluka, S. O. 2019. “Romans 13:1–7 in Relation to Nigerian Christians’ Attitudes towards Social Activism.” In die Skriflig 53 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids. v53i1.2467
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献