Abstract
Climate change is dominating social, political and economic agendas. Because of the salience of the issue, scientists, researchers and consultants have developed a plethora of climate adaptation strategies. In this article I analyse two such strategies: Adapting South African Cities and Towns: A Local Government Guide to Climate Change Adaptation Planning by Ziervogel and Methner; and Climate Change Vulnerability in South East Queensland: A Spatial and Sectoral Assessment by Choy et al. For this analysis I utilised the PULSE3 analytical framework. My analysis indicated that the two adaptation strategies were predominantly positivist in scientific orientation. Other paradigms and theories are also applicable in explaining the issue of climate change and how to adapt to it.
Reference45 articles.
1. Adams, I. 1993. Political Ideology Today. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
2. Adger, W. N., N. W. Arnell, and E. L. Tompkins. 2005. “Successful Adaptation to Climate Change across Scales.” Global Environmental Change 15 (2): 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005.
3. Albert, M., and B. Buzan. 2013. “International Relations Theory and the ‘Social Whole’: Encounters and Gaps between IR and Sociology.” International Political Sociology 7 (2): 117–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12013.
4. Alvesson, M., and A. Spicer, eds. 2011. Metaphors We Lead By: Understanding Leadership in the Real World. London: Routledge.
5. Aron, R. 1967. “What Is a Theory of International Relations?” Journal of International Affairs 21 (1): 185–206.