Decentralisation and Water Governance in Africa: A Zimbabwean Case Study

Author:

Taruvinga Gwinyai Regis

Abstract

Decentralisation is widely seen as an effective method for empowering local communities in developing countries. This article discusses decentralisation within the context of water governance, using Zimbabwe as a case study. Its main argument is that although decentralisation is faced with challenges, it remains one of the most effective ways to govern water resources. At the core of decentralisation is the belief that citizens should have the opportunity to participate directly in governing resources in their communities. Within the African context, decentralisation becomes even more important considering the continent’s history of colonisation, where certain communities were marginalised and had little influence over the management of resources, such as water. The introduction of Integrated Water Resources Management aimed to address the inequalities inherited by post-colonial states. It advocated for a decentralised system of governance, and countries like South Africa and Zimbabwe incorporated it into their new water policies. In Zimbabwe, the 1998 Water Act aimed to address the inequalities caused by colonial rule. While the article argues for the importance of decentralisation in effective water governance, it also outlines the challenges faced in this process. For instance, it contends that in some countries, like Ghana, the government often interferes in the decentralisation process to assert its authority. In Zimbabwe, the main challenge arises from the ruling party, which perceives decentralisation, particularly devolution, as an obstacle to its control over the country.

Publisher

UNISA Press

Reference38 articles.

1. Awuah, A. K., S. Stuart-Hill, and D. Trotter-Boardman. 2024. “Investigating the Perceptions of Water Managers on IWRM and Adaptive Management in the uMngeni Catchment.” The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies 20 (1): 2–23. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2023.183

2. Acemoglu, D., and J. A. Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. London: Profile Books. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae29-2j

3. Biswas, A. 2008. “Integrated Water Resources Management: Is it Working?” International Journal of Water Resources Development 24 (1): 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620701871718

4. Bosworth, B., S. Hegga, and G. Ziervogel. 2018. “When Participation is not Enough: Lessons from Decentralised Water Governance in Namibia.” https://weadapt.org/knowledge-base/assar/lessons-from-decentralised-water-governance-in-namibia/#:~:text=Decentralisation%20aims%20to%20shift%20responsibility,water%20governance%20and%20effective%20participation

5. Chigwata, T. 2018. Provincial and Local Government Reform in Zimbabwe: An Analysis of the Law, Policy, and Practice. Cape Town: Juta.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3