Abstract
This article focuses on political processes, specifically redistricting, which is the political process of redrawing electoral boundaries within which people contest local government elections. It has, however, become common practice for the political party in power to review electoral boundaries in its favour, a practice known as gerrymandering. In South Africa, municipal boundary review, which takes place every five years to either determine new boundaries or re-determine existing boundaries for the purposes of municipal elections, has always given rise to objections. The reasons for such objections range from the lack of public participation in the demarcation process to public perceptions of the value of belonging to one municipality as opposed to another, tribalism, and service delivery concerns. The main findings emanating from the scrutiny of literature on municipal boundary determination protests and the two municipal case studies in South Africa revealed elements of gerrymandering motivated by the political aspirations of those in power.
Reference48 articles.
1. Africa News Agency. 2015. “Ventersdorp/Potch Merger is not Welcome: Residents.” http://www.enca.com/south-africa/ventersdorppotch-merger-not-welcome-%E2%80%93-residents.
2. Ansolabehere, S., and M. Palmer. 2015. “A Two Hundred-year Statistical History of the Gerrymander.” Presentation at the Congress and History Conference, Vanderbilt University, May 22–23.
3. Auditor General South Africa (AGSA). 2021. Consolidated General Report on the Local Government Audit Outcomes MFMA 2019–20.
4. Brunell, T. L. 2006. “Rethinking Redistricting: How Drawing Uncompetitive Districts Eliminates Gerrymanders, Enhances Representation and Improves Attitudes toward Congress.” Political Science and Politics 39 (1): 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096506060173.
5. Cameron, R. 2006. “Local Government Boundary Reorganisation.” In Democracy and Delivery: Urban Policy in South Africa, edited by U. Pillay, R. Tomlinson, and J. du Toit. Cape Town: HSRC.