Main Predictor(s) of Good Corporate Governance in National Government Departments: A Decision-tree Classification and Prediction Analyses

Author:

Erasmus Lourens JacobusORCID,Coetzee PhilnaORCID

Abstract

Purpose: Good public sector corporate governance leads to good management, stewardship of public wealth, public engagement, and ultimately, better outcomes for citizens. As South Africa has one of the worst Gini coefficients in the world, its public sector should effectively address the challenges of inequality, poverty, and unemployment. Yet, almost 30% of national and provincial government departments obtain unfavourable audit outcomes. Methodology: Supporting the drive for clean audit outcomes that equate to good corporate governance, the research objective was to determine the predictors of national government departments’ corporate governance success. The study used CHAID (chi-squared automatic interaction detection) analyses, a decision-tree technique based on information reported over a 13-year period. Findings: The CHAID analyses indicated that national government departments’ corporate governance success is primarily explained by three factors, namely: a quality internal audit function (main predictor), the number of fraud incidents, and the number of internal control weaknesses. Implication: Even though all the variables in this study receive attention in literature and regulation, the problem of unfavourable audit outcomes persists. The question is where to focus on resolving the problem. Regulators may take note of where to focus their efforts in strengthening elements of good corporate governance.

Publisher

UNISA Press

Reference59 articles.

1. Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, and G. F. Peters. 2004. “Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 23 (1): 69–87. http://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.1.69

2. AGSA. 2022a. “Our Vision.” Auditor-General of South Africa. Accessed November 9, 2022. https://www.agsa.co.za/AboutUs/OurVision.aspx

3. AGSA. 2022b. “2020/21 Consolidated general report on national and provincial audit outcomes.” Auditor-General of South Africa. Accessed November 11, 2022. https://www.agsa.co.za/Portals/0/Reports/PFMA/202021/Citiz’n’s%20Report%20PFMA%202020-21%20FINAL%20-%20no%20spine.pdf?ver=2022-02-22-161944-810

4. Ahmad, F., M. Bradbury, and A. Habib. 2022. “Political Connections, Political Uncertainty and Audit Fees: Evidence from Pakistan.” Managerial Auditing Journal 37 (2): 255–282. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-06-2020-2715

5. Ali, M. J., R. K. S. Singh, and M. Al-Akram. 2018. “The Impact of Audit Committee Effectiveness on Audit Fees and Non-audit Service Fees: Evidence from Australia.” Accounting Research Journal 31 (2): 174–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-11-2015-0144

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3