Abstract
Positive youth development programmes seek to actively develop positive qualities in young people through life skills training, leadership training, recreational or wilderness activities, community service, mentoring, counselling and job placement training. We evaluated a positive youth development programme implemented in the Western Cape, South Africa, by following up with graduates who had completed the programme between one and five years prior. Using an ex-post facto, quasi-experimental design, propensity scores were used to identify a sample of successful graduates who has completed the programme (N Treatment = 32) and a sample of people who had applied to the programme but were not selected into the programme (N Control = 33). Quantitative data from the impact evaluation were combined with qualitative interviews with past beneficiaries. The evaluation found no significant difference between past participants and non-participants in terms of resilience, education attainment, employment, self-reported drug use, gang involvement, community integration, family relationships, and involvement in community service. The qualitative findings suggest that while such programmes may be capable of producing short-term benefits for participants, the sustainability of the short-term benefits and their translation into long-term positive outcomes was not evidenced by this evaluation. We make recommendations for improving programme design aspects, such as an emphasis on post-programme services and contextual factors such as socioeconomic climate, and emphasise how these factors need to be addressed in order to strengthen the plausibility of the causal mechanism of these programmes.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Development,Health (social science)
Reference32 articles.
1. Chrysalis Academy. 2018. Chrysalis Academy Strategic Plan: 01 April 2018 – 31 March 2021. Chrysalis Academy.
2. Africa Check. 2021. “Factsheet: South Africa’s Crime Statistics for 2019/20.” Accessed November 15, 2021. https://africacheck.org/.
3. Blais, Ann-Renée, Megan M. Thompson, and Donald R. McCreary. 2006. Post-Deployment Reintegration Measure: Psychometric Replication and Preliminary Validation Results. Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC Toronto TR 2005-277). http://cradpdf.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/PDFS/unc104/p525084_A1b.pdf.
4. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
5. Brinkerhoff, R O. 2003. The Success Case Method: Find Out Quickly What’s Working and What’s Not. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.