Abstract
More than twenty years have passed since the establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC), by means of the Rome Statute (ICC Statute). Of the 120 states, thirty-three are from the African continent. The ICC is often perceived as being Eurocentric and retributive in nature. This is because it is often insensitive to cases from the African continent. The case of Prosecutor v Dominic Ongwen, which is the focal point of this article, illustrates this point. Ongwen, a former child soldier who became a warlord in the Lord’s Resistance Army committed numerous crimes under international law and was sentenced to twenty-five years imprisonment. His case was complex and required a wider approach than the retributive position adopted by the ICC. African traditional justice mechanisms were generally overlooked. This article resents this approach taken and proposes that the ICC should have taken a more Africanised stance in this case. The article aims to contribute to the field of research on the Africanisation and decolonisation of international criminal law.
Reference119 articles.
1. Achebe C, Things Fall Apart (Penguin Books 1959).
2. African Union, ‘Agenda 2063: The Africa that we want’ accessed 15 November 2022.
3. African Union, ‘Protocol on Amendments to the Protocol on the Statute of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights, Status List’ accessed 2 September 2023.
4. Aliverti A and others, ‘Decolonizing the Criminal Question’ (2021) 23(3) Punishment & Society
5. Allen RL, ‘Reassessing the Internal (Neo) Colonialism Theory’ (2005) 35(1) The Black Scholar