Abstract
This article examines how cultural beliefs and patriarchal practices during the early period of the spread of Christianity promoted intimate partner violence (IPV) against women in the church. The article begins by exploring some cultural and patriarchal beliefs that were practised by the Jews and Giriama people during the pre-evangelistic period that promoted IPV against women through religious and cultural practices to see violence as normal, thus choosing to persevere in violent relationships. New strategies for preventing IPV against women have been discussed. In this descriptive research, data were collected from 52 informants using questionnaires and in-depth interviews. The study interviewed 30 women facing IPV individually. Abused women provided information in focus group discussions. Ten pastors were sampled in order to gather data on how cultural and patriarchal practices with the support of biased biblical interpretation of texts, promoted IPV against Christian women. Twelve questionnaires were administered to six gender officers, three probation officers and three social workers, and the findings were used to supplement data collected from the key informants. This study established that some Bible texts are interpreted and used by wife abusers and pastors offering counselling to the IPV victims to promote and justify IPV. It, therefore, recommended that the church should organise to re-read and re-learn these Bible texts with a view to interpreting them without being biased against women. The church should also re-examine all patriarchal passages in the Bible with a view to facilitating contextual and reasoned scrutiny of the male-controlled beliefs and practices that promote IPV against women. The article established that cultural beliefs and patriarchal practices promote IPV against women. Some pastors and wife abusers interpret some Bible verses to justify spousal abuse; however, if the problem of IPV is to be prevented, the church, the government, and other stakeholders involved in a war against IPV on women must embrace new strategies that are free from cultural and patriarchal beliefs and practices.
Reference47 articles.
1. Ackermann, D. 1997. “Earth Leadership in South Africa. Challenges to the Church.” Ecotheology: 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1558/ecotheology.v1i2.48.
2. Adeyemi, L. 1998. “The Yoruba Cultural Values and the Ideology of Feminism.” In Multi-disciplinary Perspectives in Nigerian Studies, 49–58, edited by Rotimi Ajayi, Olu Alana, and Yemi Akinwumi. Ilorin: Nathdex.
3. Ahmad, F., N. Driver, M. J. McNally, and D. E. Stewart. 2009. “Why Doesn’t she Seek Help for Partner Abuse? An Exploratory Study with South Asian Immigrant Women.” Social Science and Medicine 69 (4): 613–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.06.011.
4. Armstrong, A. 1997. “Consent and Compensation: The Sexual Abuse of Girls in Zimbabwe in Ncube.” In Law, Culture, Tradition and Children’s Rights in Eastern and Southern Africa, edited by Welshman. Aldershot, Great Britain/Brookfield, Vermont: Ashgate/Dartmouth Publishers.
5. Baker, C. K., S. L. Cook, and F. H. Norris. 2003. “Domestic Violence and Housing Problems: A Contextual Analysis of Women’s Help-seeking, Received Informal Support, and Formal System Response.” Violence Against Women 9 (7): 754–783. http://doi.org/10.1177/1077801203253402.