How (Most) Philosophers Have Failed Humanity

Author:

Olivier BertORCID

Abstract

This paper focuses on the theme of “how (most) philosophers have been struck by blindness in the age of the ‘great reset’ and failed humanity.” I have been able to trace only a few philosophers or intellectuals who have seen through the fog of dis- and misinformation to grasp the iatrocratic and corporatocratic aims of private global organisations, namely to reduce the numbers of, and enslave the rest of humanity by various lethal and otherwise destructive means. The paper initially concentrates on the question of what a philosopher is, followed by a discussion of the contributions of four exemplary philosophers who have had the perspicacity and courage to grasp the true nature of forced global events since the start of the “pandemic.” It further focuses on some criticism against their position(s), where necessary providing evidence to either support or invalidate the positions concerned. Evidence is adduced for the claim that those who submitted to Draconian rules and unjustified injections did not think through the manner in which this happened, nor did the necessary prior research concerning the vaunted safety of the “vaccines” or the probable ultimate goal of forces driving the neo-fascist transformation of contemporary society.

Publisher

UNISA Press

Subject

General Medicine

Reference59 articles.

1. Agamben, G. 1998. “Homo Sacer.” Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford University Press.

2. Agamben, G. 2021. Where Are We Now? The Epidemic as Politics, translated by V. Dani. London: Eris.

3. Atwood, M. 1985. The Handmaid’s Tale. Free e-book, Electronic library. Downloaded July 5, 2019.

4. Bratton, B. 2021. “Agamben WTF, or how Philosophy Failed the Pandemic.” Verso, 28 July. Accessed July 30, 2021. https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/5125-agamben-wtf-or-how-philosophy-failed-the-pandemic.

5. Brown, N. 2022. “Elon Musk Claims Risk of his Assassination Is ‘Quite Significant’.” New York Post, 4 December. Accessed December 12, 2022. https://nypost.com/2022/12/04/elon-musk-claims-risk-of-his-assassination-is-quite-significant/.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Parrhesia as therapy in ‘fragile times’;Psychotherapy & Politics International;2024-07-23

2. Kant’s Perpetual Peace (1795) and the Russia-Ukraine/NATO Conflict;Phronimon;2024-02-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3