Affiliation:
1. Baikal State University
Abstract
The evidentiary value of expertise is indisputable. Today, due to the development of the adversarial principle, rapid progress of science and technology, high technology, the involvement in criminal proceedings of persons with specialized knowledge, who are not the State experts, is particularly demanded and justified. However, the possibility of using the a non-State expert’s opinion as evidence in a case is poorly regulated by the current criminal procedural legislation both as for establishing the legal status of a non-State expert, the procedure to tender in evidence the expert’s opinion in the criminal case file and for its verifying and evaluating.
The evaluator often lacks sufficient special knowledge to assess the correctness of the methodology used, the tests performed, the validity of the findings, the evaluator cannot assess the competence of the expert in these matters, within which he/she gives the expert opinion. In this regard, the author has developed and systematized an algorithm for sequential verification and evaluation of a non-State expert’s opinion.
Reference10 articles.
1. Koisin A.A. Evaluation of the Expert›s Opinion: Criminalistic and Criminal Procedural Aspects. Sibirskii yuridicheskii vestnik = Siberian Legal Bulletin, 2022, no. 4, pp. 98–106. (In Russian). EDN: MPHADR. DOI: 10.26516/2071-8136.2022.4.98.
2. Bufetova M.Sh., Demeshko I.V. Participation of a Defense Attorney in Carrying Out of a Forensic Examination: Issues of the Evidentiary Aspect. Advokatskaya praktika = Advocate’s Practice. 2019, no. 1, pp. 3–6. (In Russian). EDN: VRFISJ.
3. Lukoshkina S.V., Bufetova M.Sh. Verdict and Testimony of the Expert in Russian Criminal Proceedings. Sibirskie ugolovnoprotsessual’nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya = Siberian Criminal Procedure and Criminalistic Readings, 2019, no. 2, pp. 36–45. (In Russian). EDN: YZZFZI.
4. Dneprovskaya M.A., Hertueva S.L. Problems of Differentiation Findings of Experts and Specialist. Sibirskie ugolovnoprotsessual’nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya = Siberian Criminal Procedure and Criminalistic Readings, 2013, no. 1, pp. 28–34. (In Russian). EDN: TPXAMZ.
5. Egorov N.N., Protasevich A.A. Using Special Knowledge: History, Status and Prospects of Development. Sibirskie ugolovno-protsessual’nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya = Siberian Criminal Procedure and Criminalistic Readings, 2022, no. 1, pp. 101–117. (In Russian). EDN: AMEYOJ. DOI: 10.17150/2411-6122.2022.1.101-117.