Affiliation:
1. Lomonosov Moscow State University
Abstract
The legal regulation of social relations in virtual reality is attracting an increasing attention of scholars. There are corresponding Russian and foreign publications concerning different branches of law: civil, tax, labor, international humanitarian, and criminology.
Criminological research is based, among other things, on the analysis of sociocultural factors: how online gaming behavior influences the «cultural normalization» of similar behavior in the real world, the problems and boundaries of permitted violence. At the same time, the problem of infringements on virtual game property is becoming more urgent. The first reason for this is the fact that the possession of virtual property can have legal and economic consequences in the real world. The second reason is connected with the absence, in most jurisdictions, of the legal regulation of the emerging property rights (or other «rights in rem») to game property, which hinders prosecution for crimes against it, or makes it impossible in some countries where criminal law protection is linked to positive legislation.
The authors believe that it is best to view these crimes as offences against property, and not cybercrimes in the narrow sense of the word. It is obvious that the problems of defining the crime of theft in the virtual space are connected with the understanding of the object and other features of theft, and the analysis thus mainly focuses on comparing the legal nature of virtual game property with how it corresponds to the features of theft in the current legislation. Key concepts of the legal nature of virtual game property are formulated, which are then analyzed from the standpoint of their applicability in criminal law. According to the authors, there are two main ways to solve the problem of virtual game property protection: either, following the approaches found in foreign practice, the definition of theft should be broadened, or the legal protection regime sui generis should be created to deal with the protection of all cyber aspects of property relations.
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Reference25 articles.
1. Duranske B.T. Virtual Law. Navigating Legal Landscapes of Virtual Worlds. Chicago, American Bar Association, 2008. 461 p.
2. Huizinga Jo. Homo Ludens: Proeve Ener Bepaling Van Het Spelelement Der Cultuur. Groningen, Wolters-Noordhoff cop., 1985. 209 p. (Russ. ed.: Huizinga Jo. Homo ludens. Saint Petersburg, Ivan Limbakh Publ., 2011. 416 p.).
3. Lodder A.R. The 2009 Dutch Convictions on Virtual Theft Conflict Resolution in Virtual Worlds: General Characteristics. Virtual Worlds and Criminality, 2010. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1590144.
4. Adrian A. Beyond griefing: Virtual Crime. Computer Law & Security Review, 2010, vol. 26, iss. 6, pp. 640–648. DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2010.09.003.
5. Atkinson R., Rodgers T. Pleasure Zones and Murder Boxes: Online Pornography and Violent Video Games as Cultural Zones of Exception. The British Journal of Criminology, 2016, vol. 56, iss. 6, pp. 1291–1307. DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azv113.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献