Latency of High-Tech Crimes: Concept, Structure and Methods of Assessing its Level

Author:

Polyakov Vitaly1

Affiliation:

1. Altai State University

Abstract

The detection and solving rates for high-tech crimes result in our insufficient knowledge about the true scale of high-tech crimes and hinders the organization of fighting them. The author discusses specific features and characteristics of high-tech crimes and offers an interpretation of the concept of their latency. Key factors influencing the latency of high-tech crimes are analyzed and main types of natural and artificial latency of such offences are identified. The author reveals and examines the factors that lead to a considerable increase in high-tech crime latency, including specific victimogenic factors. It is suggested that a coefficient reflecting the real contribution of hidden and concealed crimes to the actual criminality should be used for the quantitative assessment of latency rate for this group of crimes. The article presents a description of the specific features of methods and approaches used for the quantitative assessment of high-tech crime latency rate, including the me­thods of analogy, expert evaluation, and the information-comparison method. The difficulties of applying traditional methods of analyzing latency, specifically, methods of analyzing victimization, have been researched. The author presents the results of the expert evaluation method obtained by conducting a questionnaire for various groups of respondents. Special attention is paid to the necessity of developing new methods aimed at detecting high-tech crimes and providing a more accurate asses­sment of their latency. The Honeypot system is given as an example. It is concluded that high-tech crimes should be viewed as high latency crimes with an increasing negative trend for latency. The specific correlation between latency and public danger of these crimes is pointed out. The conducted research should contribute to organizing the counteraction to modern high-tech crimes. The obtained results could improve the effectiveness of criminalistic methods and recommendations used at the initial stage of investigating high-tech crimes and improve the rate of solving them.

Publisher

Baikal State University

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science

Reference39 articles.

1. Inshakov S.M. Latent Crime as an Object of Research. Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra = Criminology: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, 2009, no. 1, pp. 107–130. (In Russian). EDN: TIIPIL.

2. Mazurov V.A., Polyakov V.V. Criminology and Criminal Prevention Crimes in Sphere of High Information and Telecommunication Technologies. Izvestiya Altaiskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta = Izvestiya of Altai State University, 2009, no. 2, pp. 95–98. (In Russian). EDN: KXQZEL.

3. Bertovsky L.V., Glazunova I.V. Criminal Violation of Economic Activity Rules (a Criminological Characteristic). Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Financial University, 2016, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 147–155. (In Russian). EDN: WZQVVJ.

4. Evdokimov K.N. Countering Computer Crime in the Russian Federation: Criminological and Criminal Law Aspects. Irkutsk, ILI (b) UP RF Publ., 2016. 267 p. EDN: YNINGZ.

5. Leukfeldt E.R., Lavorgna A., Kleemans E.R. Organised Cybercrime or Cybercrime that is Organised? An Assessment of the Conceptualisation of Financial Cybercrime as Organised Crime. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 2017, vol. 23, iss. 3, pp. 287–300. DOI: 10.1007/s10610-016-9332-z.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3