Electronic Document as a Type of Physical Evidence in Russian Criminal Proceedings

Author:

Bufetova Mariam1

Affiliation:

1. Baikal State University

Abstract

The paper is devoted to a new type of physical evidence — an electronic document. The author examines specific features of this type of evidence and the questions of its categorization as physical evidence. An electronic document, as physical evidence, is compared with the categories “digital carriers of information”, “electronic evidence” and “computer information”. Specifics of the mechanism of trace formation for electronic evidence and its reflection in the outside world are studied. The topical issue of this study is the legal ambiguousness of the concept of electronic, or “digital” evidence, which is used as a source of information. The use of the definition “electronic document” from the standpoint of different approaches and the questions of its statutory regulation in Russian criminal court proceedings are examined. The author’s definition of an electronic document as evidence in criminal proceedings is formulated, key types of electronic documents and their specific features are named. The author studies the legal force and the criteria for the admissibility of such evidence in court. Views of difference authors regarding the use of gadgets for the recovery of electronic evidence and the need for the participation of an expert in the recovery and copying of electronic data are presented. It is concluded that this topic requires further work due to the total informatization of society, which is currently underway, and that such questions should be settled in legislation.

Publisher

Baikal State University

Reference9 articles.

1. Vilkova T.Yu., Maziuk P.V., Khokhryakov M.A. Expediency as the Principle and Grounds for Decision-Making in Criminal Proceedings: Foreign Experience and the Prospects for Using it in Russia. Vserossiiskii kriminologicheskii zhurnal = Russian Journal of Criminology, 2022, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 91–100. (In Russian). EDN: EOMQDJ. DOI: 10.17150/2500-4255.2022.16(1).91-100.

2. Smirnova I.G. Protection of the Personal Rights in the Criminal Legal Proceedings of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan. Sibirskie ugolovno-protsessual'nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya = Siberian Criminal Process and Criminalistic Readings, 2018, no. 3, pp. 7–12. (In Russian). EDN: YLVDRJ.

3. Dolgov A.M. Reaching the Objectives of Criminal Proceedings in the Conditions of Digitizing the Criminal Process. Sibirskie ugolovno-protsessual'nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya = Siberian Criminal Process and Criminalistic Readings, 2019, no. 1, pp. 56–59. (In Russian). EDN: ZZNYMH.

4. Dunaeva M.S. Some Issues Relating to Electronic Media in the Criminal Procedure of Evidence. Voprosy rossiiskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava = Matters of Russian and International Law, 2019, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 369–373. (In Russian). EDN: TMCSUD.

5. Kozhemyakin A.Yu. The Concept of Material Evidence: Debatable Issues of Theory. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Vestnik of Samara State University, 2007, no. 5-2, pp. 159–169. (In Russian).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3