From Family Household Economics to the Economic Theory of the Modern Family: Sesquicentennial Shifts in Ontology and Epistemology

Author:

Latov Yury1ORCID,Latova Natalia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Sociology — branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the evolution of institutions of the household and the family, as well as their perception in economics from the nineteenth century to the present day. Modern academic literature largely preserves the notion of an undivided unity of family and household, which is inherited from the 19th century neoclassical economic thought and reflects the socio-economic realities that existed a century and a half ago. However, following the active emancipation of individuals from the traditional family in the West in the first half of the 20th century, the process of gradual disappearance of family households as one of the three major (along with the firm and the state) economic actors began. In modern western countries, the decision makers in the markets of labour, capital and consumer goods are no longer families, but independent individuals. Families do not disappear, but in western countries they are transformed into a kind of partner firms, whose members freely choose/change partners according to changing personal needs. This qualitative change in the nature of family unions was reflected in the 1980s in “the economic theory of the family” based on the approaches of Gary Becker and Robert A. Pollak, where the behaviour of sexual / marital partners is consistently likened to market behaviour. These trends of changing ontology and epistemology of the family as an economic entity are very important for understanding the capabilities and limitations of traditional family support policies manifested in modern Russia.

Publisher

Baikal State University

Subject

Applied Mathematics,General Mathematics

Reference19 articles.

1. McConnell C.P., Brue S.L. Economics: Principles, Problems, and Policies. 13th ed. New York, McGraw-Hill/ Irwin, 1991. Vol. 2. 808 p. (Russ. ed.: McConnell C.P., Brue S.L. Economics: Principles, Problems, and Policies. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1992. Vol. 2. 400 p.).

2. Laslett P. The Family and the Household: a Historical Approach. In Vishnevskii A.G., Kon I.S. (eds). Marriage, Fertility and the Family Over Three Centuries. Moscow, Statistika Publ., 1979, pp. 132–157. (In Russian).

3. Guillaumin C. Racism, Sexism, Power and Ideology. London, Routledge, 1995, 288 p.

4. Coontz S. The Family Revolution. Greater Good Magazine, 2007. Available at: https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/the_family_revolution.

5. Mironova A., Prokofieva L. Family and household in Russia: the demographic aspect. Demograficheskoe obozrenie = Demographic Review, 2018, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 103–121. (In Russian). EDN: XWCDYT.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3