Analysis of the Deviant Usage of Criticism in Discourse Innovations of Cancel Culture and Woke Culture

Author:

Barebina Natalya1ORCID,Kostyushkina Galina2

Affiliation:

1. Irkutsk State Transport University; Baikal State University

2. Irkutsk Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The research analyzed the deviant usage of critique in discourse innovations in the form of cancel culture and woke culture. These innovations represent modern ways of criticism, which rapid spread is due to network communication. The basis for classifying these types of criticism as deviant usage is the destruction of the locus of critical rationality. The problem is that the heuristic ideal of critique may be changed significantly due to the legitimation of non-standard forms of criticism. The authors identified several clusters of the normative ideal of critical activity in the form of negative assessment, logic, social constructivism, in which the category of rationality is considered. This category allows us to analyze the discourse practice of critique regarding the correspondence theory of truth using linguo-argumentative method of analysis. While using these strategies the authors came to the following conclusions. The verbalization of cancel culture represents a reactive action of critique that implements polemical negation. Criticism in woke culture reveals signs of descriptive negation. The deviant usage of critique as reasoning in the innovations under discussion is represented by errors in argumentation, factoid nature of discourse, and a mixture of stylistic modes belonging to discourses of varying degrees of institutionalization, which constitute aberrations of the rational standard of criticism.

Publisher

Baikal State University

Reference32 articles.

1. Khomelev V.G. Philosophical foundations of the scientific theory of criticism. Doct. Diss. Thesis. Saint Petersburg, 2004. 40 p.

2. Demyankov V.Z. Transfer in Rhetoric of Scientific Discourse. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka = Cognitive Studies of Language, 2023, no. 1, pp. 27–33. (In Russian). EDN: QSBWAJ.

3. Maksishko R.Yu. Reflections on criticism. In Mikhailova I.D. (ed.). Methodology of Scientific Research. Materials of the Scientific Seminar. Yaroslavl, 2021, iss. 2, pp. 29–36. (In Russian). EDN: SDGVCQ.

4. Hansen H.V., Pinto R.C. Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings. University Park, Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995. 368 p.

5. Walton D. Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 2007. 307 p.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3