Affiliation:
1. V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University
2. Saratov Medical University "Reaviz"
Abstract
The failure rate in arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is conditioned by irrational aligning of the drilled transosseous canals, different mechanical properties of the synthetic or auto/allografts, and the number of fixators. By now the published studies on the correlation between failure rate and methods of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction are few. The objective of this research was the investigation of the correlation between the failure rate and certain techniques of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction in patients with its complete isolated rapture.Materials and methods. The study involved 84 patients who in due time underwent single- or double-bundle reconstruction with synthetic implants, or the reconstruction by a semitendinosus and gracilis autografts. The failure rate was estimated in 3, 6, and 12 months by the presence of true clinical signs of the ACL failure along with the patient’s corresponding complaints of the knee joint instability in regular physical load.Results. No differences were observed in the failures rates after surgeries performed by various arthroscopic reconstruction techniques in all periods of observation revealed by the interpretation of true clinical signs of ACL failure and confirmed by the Fisher's exact test value (р > 0.05) and χ2(р > 0.05) for the three groups overall.Conclusion. The examination of patients with complete isolated ACL rapture in all periods of observation for the three samples revealed no correlation between arthroscopic ACL reconstruction failure rates and the employed techniques.
Publisher
Reaviz Medical University
Reference13 articles.
1. Shormanov AM, Norkin AI, Klimov SS, Chibrikova JuA, Ulyanov VYu, Bakhteeva NKh. Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes of various methods of anterior cruciate ligament arthroplasty in knee joint in complete rupture of the ligament. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 2018;14 (2):251-259. (In Russ).
2. Simonian PT, Harrison SD, Cooley VJ, Escabedo EM, Deneka DA, Larson RV. Assessment of morbidity of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon harvest for ACL reconstruction. Am J Knee Surg. 1997;10(2):54-59.
3. Shaerf DA, Pastides P.S., Sarraf K.M., Willis-Owen C.A. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction best practice: A review of graft choice. World J Orthop. 2014;5(1):23-29. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v5.i1.23
4. Tiamklang T, Sumanont S, Foocharoen T, Laopaiboon M. Double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11(11):CD008413. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008413.pub2
5. Siebold R, Dehler C, Ellert T. Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(2):137-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2007.11.013