Abstract
Short-form communication is increasingly recognised as a pivotal tool in academia for conveying complex ideas succinctly and accessibly. This literature review synthesises key findings in 2024, focusing on the use of abstracts, executive summaries, and brief reports. Brief reports, typically under 2,000 words, facilitate rapid publication and immediate academic impact. Research by Alperin et al. shows that engaging abstracts increase readership and citations, boosting the visibility of academic work. Short-form communication also engages non-specialist audiences, bridging the gap between complex research and practical application. Additionally, integrating short-form communication into curricula enhances students' critical reading and concise writing skills. Despite these advancements, challenges remain in maintaining academic rigour. Future research should develop best practices to preserve the depth of academic discourse. This review highlights the significant impact and ongoing evolution of short-form communication in academic settings and the need for greater dissemination insights.
Reference6 articles.
1. Shamsi B, Christopher C, Fielding D, Frankston C, Fromme A, Huang P, et al. A framework for improving the accessibility of research papers on arXiv.org. arXiv. 2024 Feb. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.07286
2. IEEE Professional Communication Society. [Online]. [cited 2024. Available from: https://procomm.ieee.org/transactio...nes-to-follow/preparing-structured-abstracts/.
3. Identifying diffusion patterns of research articles on Twitter: A case study of online engagement with open access articles;Alperin;Public Understanding of Science,2019
4. Emerald Publishing. Closing the impact gap Analysis 4: Future of learning & research outputs. [Online].; 2021 [cited 2024. Available from: https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing....gap/analysis-future-learning-research-outputs.
5. Wang L, Zhan Y. A conceptual peer review model for arXiv and other preprint databases. Learned Publishing. 2019 Feb; 32(3).