Affiliation:
1. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Speranskiy Children’s City Clinical Hospital No.9
2. Bashkir State Medical University
Abstract
Objective: to present the evolution and modern concept of pediatric sepsis.According to many authors, pediatric sepsis is considered to be the main cause of death from infectious diseases; and the mortality is associated with a late diagnosis and non-compliance with treatment guidelines. The article discusses the evolution of views on sepsis over the past 30 years. It analyzes the changes of sepsis concepts in adults from Sepsis-1 to Sepsis-3. Currently, sepsis is considered as a life-threatening organ dysfunction due to dysregulation of the body’s response to infection rather than a progressive systemic inflammation. Since sepsis is based on a pathobiological process, its definitions should be applied both to adults and children. However, the terminology and intensive care of pediatric sepsis is beyond the recommendations of Sepsis-3. Over the last 3 years the scientists have studied various pediatric scales to verify sepsis and introduce the Sepsis-3 ideology into pediatrics. Currently, the consensus and multidisciplinary approach of pediatricians and intensive care physicians is extremely important to achieve real success in early diagnosis and reduce mortality in children with sepsis.
Publisher
The National Academy of Pediatric Science and Innovation
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Reference24 articles.
1. Rudd K.E., Johnson S.C., Agesa K.M., Shackelford K.A., Tsoi D., Kievlan D.R. et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2020; 395: 200–211. DOI: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(19)32989-7
2. Bone R.C., Balk R.A., Cerra F.B., Dellinger R.P., Fein A.M., Knaus W.A. et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 1992; 101(6): 1644–1655.
3. Vincent J.L., Martin G., Levy M. qSOFA does not replace SIRS in the definition of sepsis. Critical Care 2016; 20(1): 210. DOI 10.1186/s13054-016-1389
4. Sprung C.L., Sakr Y., Vincent J.L., Le Gall J.R., Reinhart K., Ranieri V.M. et al. An evaluation of systemic inflammatory response syndrome signs in the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely ill Patients (SOAP) study. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32: 421–427. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-005-0039-8
5. Dulhunty J.M., Lipman J., Finfer S. Does severe non-infectious SIRS differ from severe sepsis? Results from a multi-centre Australian and New Zealand intensive care unit study. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34(9): 1654–1661. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1160-2.2008;34:1654–61
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献