Towards a Comprehensive Model of Educational Coaching? Inference towards executive competences and leadership

Author:

Díaz Chica ÓscarORCID,Cortés Pascual AlejandraORCID,Serra Mercé Álvaro

Abstract

This work alludes to the research resulting from the development of the Comprehensive Model of Educational Coaching (MICE) (ModeloIntegralCoachingEducativo.es) during two educational courses performed through training, in both individual and team coaching processes, with non-university teachers from Aragon (Spain). Data has been collected through a questionnaire about expectations, a questionnaire about technical competences, a questionnaire about transversal competences, a discussion group and an open questionnaire sent online to explore the repercussion of the training. We conclude with results related to the expectations about Educational Coaching training; its aspects for improvement, developed competences and expectations; and competences related to the managerial and teaching functions. Among highlights of the results, the study reveals that MICE encourages classroom coaching (through tutorials, work groups, attention to language use, etc.). It also fosters, among other things, the establishment of an appropriate classroom environment, respect for the students, regard for student initiatives, decision-making support, empathy and better management of information and positive emotions. The study provides results categorized by gender, connections to management teams, educational level, and characteristics of the education centre (privately administered/publicly financed and public).

Publisher

Corporacion Universitaria Iberoamericana

Reference40 articles.

1. Aldana, G. M., y Joya, N. S. (2011). Actitudes hacia la investigación científica en docentes de metodología de la investigación. Tabula Rasa, (14), 295-309. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/396/39622094012.pdf

2. Aldana, G. M., Caraballo, G. J., y Babativa (2016). Escala para medir actitudes hacia la investigación (EACIN): validación de contenido y confiabilidad. Revista Aletheia, 8(2). Recuperado de http://aletheia.cinde.org.co/index.php/ALETHEIA/article/view/325/253

3. Asociación Nacional de Universidades e Instituciones de Educación Superior. (2016). Plan de Desarrollo Institucional Visión 2030. Recuperado de http://www.anuies.mx/media/docs/avisos/pdf/PlanDesarrolloVision2030_v2. pdf

4. Ato, M., López, J., y Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de psicología, 2013, 29 (3) 1038-1059. doi:/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511

5. Barragán, C., y Cortés, J. (2009). Avances en el diseño de una Escala de Actitudes Cognitivo-Conductuales. Psiquis, 18 (5), 146-156. Recuperado de http://www.imbiomed.com.mx/1/1/articulos.php?method=showDetailyid_articulo=63670yid_seccion=3011yid_ejemplar=6392yid_revista=180

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3