Benchmark problems for transcranial ultrasound simulation: Intercomparison of compressional wave models

Author:

Aubry Jean-Francois1,Bates Oscar2,Boehm Christian3,Butts Pauly Kim4,Christensen Douglas5,Cueto Carlos2,Gélat Pierre6,Guasch Lluis7,Jaros Jiri8ORCID,Jing Yun9,Jones Rebecca10,Li Ningrui11,Marty Patrick3,Montanaro Hazael12,Neufeld Esra12,Pichardo Samuel13,Pinton Gianmarco10,Pulkkinen Aki14,Stanziola Antonio15,Thielscher Axel16,Treeby Bradley15ORCID,van 't Wout Elwin17

Affiliation:

1. Physics for Medicine Paris, National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) U1273, ESPCI Paris, Paris Sciences and Lettres University, French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) UMR 8063, Paris, France

2. Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom

3. Institute of Geophysics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland

4. Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA

5. Department of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA

6. Department of Surgical Biotechnology, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom

7. Earth Science and Engineering Department, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

8. Centre of Excellence IT4Innovations, Faculty of Information Technology, Brno University of Technology, Bozetechova 2, Brno 612 00, Czech Republic

9. Graduate Program in Acoustics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA

10. Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA

11. Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA

12. Foundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society (IT'IS), Zurich, Switzerland

13. Radiology and Clinical Neurosciences Departments, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

14. Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland

15. Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom

16. Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark

17. Institute for Mathematical and Computational Engineering, School of Engineering and Faculty of Mathematics, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

Abstract

Computational models of acoustic wave propagation are frequently used in transcranial ultrasound therapy, for example, to calculate the intracranial pressure field or to calculate phase delays to correct for skull distortions. To allow intercomparison between the different modeling tools and techniques used by the community, an international working group was convened to formulate a set of numerical benchmarks. Here, these benchmarks are presented, along with intercomparison results. Nine different benchmarks of increasing geometric complexity are defined. These include a single-layer planar bone immersed in water, a multi-layer bone, and a whole skull. Two transducer configurations are considered (a focused bowl and a plane piston operating at 500 kHz), giving a total of 18 permutations of the benchmarks. Eleven different modeling tools are used to compute the benchmark results. The models span a wide range of numerical techniques, including the finite-difference time-domain method, angular spectrum method, pseudospectral method, boundary-element method, and spectral-element method. Good agreement is found between the models, particularly for the position, size, and magnitude of the acoustic focus within the skull. When comparing results for each model with every other model in a cross-comparison, the median values for each benchmark for the difference in focal pressure and position are less than 10% and 1 mm, respectively. The benchmark definitions, model results, and intercomparison codes are freely available to facilitate further comparisons.

Publisher

Acoustical Society of America (ASA)

Subject

Acoustics and Ultrasonics,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3