Daily Case Trends of COVID-19
-
Published:2024-05-13
Issue:
Volume:10
Page:38-57
-
ISSN:2837-4282
-
Container-title:Fine Focus
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:finefocus
Author:
Marble Lillia,McKillip John
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused immense and immeasurable disruption to billions of lives worldwide, and the strain on healthcare workers and facilities will undoubtedly be seen for years to come. Many factors impact the incidence and prevalence of COVID-19 in states, such as policies and legislation, funding, partisanship of the statehouse, vaccination rates, and rurality. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the differences in the daily positive cases between Indiana and Washington State and examine the respective ways each state tried to mitigate the morbidity and mortality of the virus. Indiana and Washington State were chosen as the states have similar populations in different geographical locations in the country and varying responses to the pandemic. Data was obtained from the respective state health departments over a period of two and a half years from March 2020 to December 2022. Independent t-tests were used for the analysis of the data between Indiana and Washington. Overall, Indiana had a higher daily positive case rate when compared to Washington. Indiana had a lower vaccination rate and had more hospitalizations and deaths compared to Washington and the US population as a whole. The difference in the findings of each state could be attributed to the partisanship of the state and the ways in which partisanship influences the enacting of legislation and policies intended to mitigate disease, as well as public health funding allocated by the state.
Publisher
Ball State University Libraries
Reference46 articles.
1. Adolph, C., Amano, K., Bang-Jensen, B., Fullman, N., & Wilkerson, J. (2021, April 1). Pandemic Politics: Timing State Level Social Distancing Responses to COVID-19. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 45(6), 997-1015. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8802162. 2. Adolph, C., Amano, K., Bang-Jensen, B., Fullman, N., Magistro, B., Reinke G., & Wilkerson, J. (2020, August 31). Governor partisanship explains the adoption of statewide mandates to wear face coverings. MedRxiv, 1-33. 3. Andrews, N., Stowe, J., Kirsebom, F., Toffa, S., Rickeard, T., Gallagher, E., Gower, C., Kall, M., Groves, N., O’Connell, A., Simons, D., Blomquist, P. B., Zaidi, A., Nash, S., Aziz, N. I. B. A., Thelwall, S., Dabrera, G., Myers, R., Amirthalingam, G., Gharbia, S., Barrett, J. C., Elson, R., Ladhani, S. N., Ferguson, N., Zambon, M., Campbell, C. N. Brown, K., Hopkins, S., Chand, M., Ramsay, M., Bernal, J. L. (2021, December 14). Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of concern. medRxiv, 2021.2012.2014.21267615. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.14.21267615 4. Ao, D., Lan, T., He, X., Liu, J., Chen, L., B, D. T., Z, K., & W, X. (2022, March 16). SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: Immune escape and vaccine development. MedComm., 3(1), e126. https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.126 5. Baccini, L., Brodeur, A. (2020, December 1). Explaining Governors’ Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Unites States. American Politics Research, 49(2), 215-220. doi: 10.1177/1532673X20973453.
|
|