English Law and the Outlaw: Resistance and Contempt-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

English Law and the Outlaw: Resistance and Contempt

Published:2022-08-11 Issue:1 Volume:4 Page:1-18
ISSN:2574-2191
Container-title:The Bulletin of the International Association for Robin Hood Studies
language:
Short-container-title:biarhs

Author:

Turner Wendy

Abstract

This article compares the actions and charges against characters in early Robin Hood tales to historical accounts of individuals charged with outlawry. The commonality between the tales of Robin Hood and historic charges of outlawry is the idea of being in contempt of court through non-appearance. Historic individuals charged with outlawry could have all their liberties under common law removed, their lands and goods confiscated by the crown, and they could be seized and taken to prison without warning. The literary Robin Hood’s experiences mirror those of these historic individuals, and comparison between tales and history demonstrate the range of behaviors audiences found plausible: wrongful charges, untrustworthy officials, plaintiffs who challenged their charges while imprisoned, and those who fought charges from outside the system as outlaws.

Publisher

Ball State University Library

Reference27 articles.

1. Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous (Chancery), Henry III-Henry V. 8 volumes. London: HMSO, 1916-2003.

2. Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem and Other Analogous Documents. London: HMSO, 1904-2009.

3. Calendar of the Patent Rolls, Edward III. 16 volumes. London: HMSO, 1891-1916.

4. Child, Francis James. English and Scottish Ballads, vol. 5. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co., 1859. https://archive.org/details/englishandscott50chilgoog/page/42/mode/1up, p. 234.

5. Chism, Christine. "Robin Hood: Thinking Globally, Acting Locally in the Fifteenth-Century Ballads." In The Letter of the Law: Legal Practice and Literary Production in Medieval England, edited by Emily Steiner and Candace Barrington, 12-39. Cornell: Cornell University Press, 2002.