Evidence-Based End-of-Life Comfort Care Guidelines

Author:

,Maranan Myla

Abstract

Practice Problem: In the absence of end-of-life (EOL) comfort care guidelines, the nurses in a medical-surgical unit are apprehensive about caring for patients in their active stage of dying, which leads to abandoning the values of holistic and patient-centered care. PICOT: The PICOT question that guided this project was: "How do acute care bedside nurses (P) who utilize the evidence-based comfort care guidelines (I) compare to not using the evidence-based guidelines (C) perceive their confidence in their capability to provide holistic and patient-centered care (O) during the active onset of the patient's end-of-life stage (T)?" Evidence: The literature indicated that accessible, evidence-based EOL comfort care guidelines could help nurses to enhance their confidence and skills to deliver holistic and patient-centered care at the bedside for actively dying patients. Intervention: The nurses identified primary stressors for a dying patient within 24 hours of the patient deemed on EOL stage using a Patient Dignity Inventory Tool as an embedded part of EOL comfort care guidelines. The nurses initiated individualized plans of care based on the stressors identified, which upheld holistic and patient-centered EOL care concepts. Outcome: Pre-and post-EOL intervention survey data attested that having accessible EOL comfort care guidelines was valuable for nurses in attaining more confidence in providing patient-centered and holistic care at the bedside for the actively dying patient. Conclusion: Accessible, standardized, evidence-based EOL comfort care guidelines fostered the nurses' ability to provide care to patients who were actively dying, embracing the core concepts of holistic and patient-centered care.

Publisher

University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences Library

Reference44 articles.

1. Aldridge, M. D., & Bradley, E. H. (2017). Epidemiology and patterns of care at the end of life: Rising complexity shifts in care patterns and sites of death. Health Affairs, 36(7), 1175-1183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0182

2. American Nursing Association Center for Ethics and Human Rights. (2016). Nurses' roles and responsibilities in providing care and support at the end of life.https://www.nursingworld.org/~4af078/globalassets/docs/ana/ethics/endoflife-positionstatement.pdf

3. Barwicjk, M.A. (2011). Checklist to assess organizational readiness (CARI) for EIP implementation. http://www.effectiveservices.org/downloads/Checklist_to_Assess_Organisational_Readiness_for_Implementation.pdf

4. Batras, D., Duff, C., & Smith, B. J. (2016). Organizational change theory: Implications for health promotion practice. Health Promotion International, 31(1), 231-241. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dau098

5. Beernaert, K., Smets, T., Cohen, J., Verhofstede, R., Costantini, M., Eecloo, K., . . . Deliens, L. (2017). Improving comfort around dying in elderly people: A cluster randomized controlled trial. The Lancet, 390(10090), 125-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31265-5

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3