Abstract
Practice Problem: In the absence of end-of-life (EOL) comfort care guidelines, the nurses in a medical-surgical unit are apprehensive about caring for patients in their active stage of dying, which leads to abandoning the values of holistic and patient-centered care. PICOT: The PICOT question that guided this project was: "How do acute care bedside nurses (P) who utilize the evidence-based comfort care guidelines (I) compare to not using the evidence-based guidelines (C) perceive their confidence in their capability to provide holistic and patient-centered care (O) during the active onset of the patient's end-of-life stage (T)?" Evidence: The literature indicated that accessible, evidence-based EOL comfort care guidelines could help nurses to enhance their confidence and skills to deliver holistic and patient-centered care at the bedside for actively dying patients. Intervention: The nurses identified primary stressors for a dying patient within 24 hours of the patient deemed on EOL stage using a Patient Dignity Inventory Tool as an embedded part of EOL comfort care guidelines. The nurses initiated individualized plans of care based on the stressors identified, which upheld holistic and patient-centered EOL care concepts. Outcome: Pre-and post-EOL intervention survey data attested that having accessible EOL comfort care guidelines was valuable for nurses in attaining more confidence in providing patient-centered and holistic care at the bedside for the actively dying patient. Conclusion: Accessible, standardized, evidence-based EOL comfort care guidelines fostered the nurses' ability to provide care to patients who were actively dying, embracing the core concepts of holistic and patient-centered care.
Publisher
University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences Library
Reference44 articles.
1. Aldridge, M. D., & Bradley, E. H. (2017). Epidemiology and patterns of care at the end of life: Rising complexity shifts in care patterns and sites of death. Health Affairs, 36(7), 1175-1183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0182
2. American Nursing Association Center for Ethics and Human Rights. (2016). Nurses' roles and responsibilities in providing care and support at the end of life.https://www.nursingworld.org/~4af078/globalassets/docs/ana/ethics/endoflife-positionstatement.pdf
3. Barwicjk, M.A. (2011). Checklist to assess organizational readiness (CARI) for EIP implementation. http://www.effectiveservices.org/downloads/Checklist_to_Assess_Organisational_Readiness_for_Implementation.pdf
4. Batras, D., Duff, C., & Smith, B. J. (2016). Organizational change theory: Implications for health promotion practice. Health Promotion International, 31(1), 231-241. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dau098
5. Beernaert, K., Smets, T., Cohen, J., Verhofstede, R., Costantini, M., Eecloo, K., . . . Deliens, L. (2017). Improving comfort around dying in elderly people: A cluster randomized controlled trial. The Lancet, 390(10090), 125-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31265-5