Measurements infrastructure — futurological considerations

Author:

Samoilenko OleksandrORCID

Abstract

Futurology as science for predicting humanity progress is important for planning specific steps to be taken today. Author made an attempt of scientific prediction concerning development of such important measurement infrastructure components as comparisons of measurement standards, interlaboratory comparisons of measurement results and calibration. Current state of this measurement infrastructure component should be improved to meet the challenges of a complicated and changeable environment. Comparisons of measurement standards are not performed often. Number of participants is limited. CMCs are difficult to obtain. Interlaboratory comparisons and calibrations are separated from comparisons, etc. Idea of measurement infrastructure future improvement is substantiated. Global informatization provides advantages and opportunities for it. The answer to modern challenges is seen in the creation of the Comprehensive Measurement Traceability Network (hereinafter — the Network). The Network is assumed to be the most automated and consequently, the fastest, the most dynamic and comprehensive. Various levels of comparisons for various measurement methods and submethods can be initiated fast, easy and without restrictions. They can be provided continuously, without interruptions. Interlaboratory comparisons and calibrations should be directly linked to comparisons of measurement standards in the Network. Interlaboratory comparisons initiated in the Network differ from comparisons of measurement standards only in the factor that they will be initiated for working measurement standards and instruments. Subjective human factors in initiating, planning, processing and analyzing measurement results will be significantly reduced in the Network. The purpose, basic (but not all) tasks and principles of such Network future work are formulated. Its advantages are underlined.

Publisher

SE Ukrmetrteststandart

Reference25 articles.

1. Chu-Shik Kang 2019 APMP Guideline for the Use of Hybrid Comparisons as Evidence Supporting CMC Claims. Report at the 40th Meeting.

2. Kuzmenko Iu., Samoilenko O., Tsiporenko S. 2021 Multipurpose measurement models for adjustment by the least squares method. Measuring Equipment and Metrology. 82, 2, pp. 29-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23939/istcmtm2021.02.029

3. JCGM 200:2012 International vocabulary of metrology — Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM).

4. Nielsen L. 2000 Evaluation of measurement intercomparisons by the method of least squares. Danish Institute of Fundamental Metrology, Technical Report DFM-99-R39.

5. Cox M. G. 2002 The evaluation of key comparison data. Metrologia. V. 39, pp. 589-595.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3