Affiliation:
1. University of Denver
2. Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Abstract
SUMMARY
We examine the relationship between audit pricing and managerial tone as a proxy of source credibility. Prior research shows that source credibility influences auditors' perceptions of client risk. Textually analyzing annual letters to shareholders, we find that characteristics of managerial tone that reflect impaired source credibility are associated with higher audit fees. Additional tests, including a change analysis and controls for other managerial characteristics, future client performance, and aggressive accounting choices, corroborate and build on our inferences that managerial tone proxies for source credibility. Our study extends literature that uses corporate disclosures to measure managerial characteristics by showing that auditors price source credibility reflected in managerial tone. These findings are important because they empirically confirm that source credibility affects auditors' assessments of engagement risk and that analysis of tone can inform researchers, auditors, and investors who seek to enhance effectiveness and objectivity in assessing source credibility based on managerial tone.
JEL Classifications: G21; G34; M41.
Data Availability: The data in this study are available from public sources indicated in the paper.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference126 articles.
1. Abbott,
J. L.,
Parker
S.,
and
PetersG.
2006.
Earnings management, litigation risk, and asymmetric audit fee responses.
Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory25 (
1):
85–
98.
https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2006.25.1.85
2. Abdel-Khalik,
A. R.,
Snowball
D.,
and
WraggeJ. H.
1983.
The effects of certain internal audit variables on the planning of external audit programs.
The Accounting Review58 (
2):
215–
227.
3. Allee,
K. D.,
and
DeAngelisM. D.
2015.
The structure of voluntary disclosure narratives: Evidence from tone dispersion.
Journal of Accounting Research53 (
2):
241–
274.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12072
4. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA).
2006.
Audit Risk and Materiality in Conducting an Audit.
New York, NY:
AICPA.
5. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA).
2015.
A Firm's System of Quality Control. Statement of Quality Control Standard No. 10.
New York, NY:
AICPA.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献