The Consequences of Accounting Failure for Innovation: A Multi-Level Analysis

Author:

Hess Megan F.1,Hess Andrew M.1

Affiliation:

1. Washington & Lee University

Abstract

SYNOPSIS In this study, we investigate the relation between accounting failure and innovation at multiple levels in an organization by developing and testing a model for how top executives and functional managers might change their risk preferences and their innovation investments in response to public disclosures of financial misconduct. At the firm level, we find that accounting failures reduce subsequent investments in R&D, as predicted by a threat rigidity (“play it safe”) psychological response among top executives. At the project level, accounting failures have the opposite effect, resulting in an increase in the number of exploratory projects, as predicted by a failure trap (“swing for the fences”) psychological response among functional managers. Unpacking this relation at multiple levels of analysis helps us to understand the complex ways in which financial misconduct shapes a firm's innovation activities and appreciate the far-reaching consequences of accounting failure.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Accounting

Reference92 articles.

1. Akhigbe, A. , KudlaR. J., and MaduraJ. 2005. Why are some corporate earnings restatements more damaging?Applied Financial Economics15 ( 5): 327– 336. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960310042000338722

2. Arthaud-Day, M. L. , CertoS. T., DaltonC. M., and DaltonD. R. 2006. A changing of the guard: Executive and director turnover following corporate accounting restatements. Academy of Management Journal49 ( 6): 1119– 1136. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.23478165

3. Audia, P. G. , and GreveH. R. 2006. Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Science52 ( 1): 83– 94. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0446

4. Baber, W. R. , FairfieldP. M., and HaggardJ. A. 1991. The effect of concern about reported income on discretionary spending decisions: The case of research and development. The Accounting Review66 (4): 818– 829.

5. Baber, W. R. , KangS., and LiangL. 2005. Strong boards, management entrenchment, and accounting restatement. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sok-Hyon_Kang/publication/229050356_Strong_boards_management_entrenchment_and_accounting_restatement/links/0f317533f3051f09c1000000.pdf

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3