Abstract
SYNOPSIS
Concerns about high rates of government corruption in resource rich countries have led transparency advocates to urge oil and gas firms to disclose payments to host governments for natural resources. Transparency, they argue, can increase government accountability and mitigate corruption. However, we find a low frequency of voluntary disclosures of payments by oil and gas firms, and negative stock price reactions for affected firms at the announcement of regulations mandating disclosure. This suggests that sample firm managers and their investors perceive that such disclosures generate private costs, despite any public benefits. We document that industry self-regulation has generated information to substitute for the gap in voluntary company disclosure and that such disclosures are accompanied by lower country corruption ratings. This suggests that collective action could be an effective way for companies to manage the private costs of disclosure and respond to public pressure for transparency that could provide public benefits.
JEL Classification: M441; M48; H41; G38.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Reference31 articles.
1. The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings;Ball;Journal of Accounting and Economics,2000
2. Total settles U.S. bribe probe for $398 million, CEO may be tried;Boselli;Reuters,2013
3. What determines corporate transparency?;Bushman;Journal of Accounting Research,2004
4. The case for company-by-company reporting of data in the extractive industries transparency initiative;Darby,2009
5. Country risk: Economic aspects;Eaton;Managing International Risk,1983
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献