Author:
Epping Lori L,Wilder W. Mark
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is to observe the extent to which U.S.-listed foreign firms report non-GAAP financial performance measures and to compare the characteristics of these disclosures to those of U.S. firms. Using a matched-sample design, this research compares U.S.-listed foreign firm and U.S. firm non-GAAP disclosure frequency, non-GAAP disclosure adjustment characteristics, and reconciliation quality. Tests of the hypotheses indicate similar disclosure frequencies for U.S. firms and U.S.-listed foreign firms. Analyses of non-GAAP disclosure and adjustment characteristics provide evidence consistent with the interpretation that U.S. firms engage in aggressive non-GAAP reporting behaviors (reporting income-increasing adjustments and adjusting GAAP numbers with a greater magnitude and with a higher number of adjustments) equally or more so than U.S.-listed foreign firms. However, the quality of U.S. firm reconciliations to U.S. GAAP is equal to or greater than that of U.S.-listed foreign firms.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference33 articles.
1. Pro forma disclosure and investor sophistication: external validation of experimental evidence using archival data;Allee;Accounting, Organizations and Society,2007
2. Assessing the relative informativeness and permanence of pro forma earnings and GAAP operating earnings;Bhattacharya;Journal of Accounting and Economics,2003
3. Empirical evidence on recent trends in pro forma reporting;Bhattacharya;Accounting Horizons,2004
4. Who trades on pro forma earnings information?;Bhattacharya;The Accounting Review,2007
5. Black, D. E.,
E. L. Black,
T. E. Christensen, and W. G. Heninger.
2010. Has the Regulation of Pro Forma Reporting in the U.S. Protected Investors from Potentially Misleading Adjusted Earnings Disclosures? Working paper, Brigham Young University.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献