U.S.-Listed Foreign Firms' Non-GAAP Financial Performance Disclosure Behavior

Author:

Epping Lori L,Wilder W. Mark

Abstract

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to observe the extent to which U.S.-listed foreign firms report non-GAAP financial performance measures and to compare the characteristics of these disclosures to those of U.S. firms. Using a matched-sample design, this research compares U.S.-listed foreign firm and U.S. firm non-GAAP disclosure frequency, non-GAAP disclosure adjustment characteristics, and reconciliation quality. Tests of the hypotheses indicate similar disclosure frequencies for U.S. firms and U.S.-listed foreign firms. Analyses of non-GAAP disclosure and adjustment characteristics provide evidence consistent with the interpretation that U.S. firms engage in aggressive non-GAAP reporting behaviors (reporting income-increasing adjustments and adjusting GAAP numbers with a greater magnitude and with a higher number of adjustments) equally or more so than U.S.-listed foreign firms. However, the quality of U.S. firm reconciliations to U.S. GAAP is equal to or greater than that of U.S.-listed foreign firms.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Accounting,Business and International Management

Reference33 articles.

1. Pro forma disclosure and investor sophistication: external validation of experimental evidence using archival data;Allee;Accounting, Organizations and Society,2007

2. Assessing the relative informativeness and permanence of pro forma earnings and GAAP operating earnings;Bhattacharya;Journal of Accounting and Economics,2003

3. Empirical evidence on recent trends in pro forma reporting;Bhattacharya;Accounting Horizons,2004

4. Who trades on pro forma earnings information?;Bhattacharya;The Accounting Review,2007

5. Black, D. E., E. L. Black, T. E. Christensen, and W. G. Heninger. 2010. Has the Regulation of Pro Forma Reporting in the U.S. Protected Investors from Potentially Misleading Adjusted Earnings Disclosures? Working paper, Brigham Young University.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3