A Comparison of XBRL Filings to Corporate 10-Ks—Evidence from the Voluntary Filing Program

Author:

Bartley Jon,Chen Al Y. S,Taylor Eileen Z

Abstract

SYNOPSIS eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) has the potential to improve the transparency of financial reports; however, its complexity creates the risk of introducing errors that are a threat to its usefulness. XBRL is a complex technological change in financial reporting of nearly unprecedented scope. Prior to June 2009, the date of the first mandated XBRL filings, the SEC made available a Voluntary Filing Program (VFP) to assist in addressing the difficulties of creating XBRL documents. This study examines errors in the VFP filings, and investigates whether stakeholders used their experience to improve the XBRL technology and processes. Findings indicate a reduction in errors over time, suggesting that the VFP for XBRL was successful. These results support the use of a VFP to identify and solve unanticipated issues and evaluate the feasibility of implementing large-scale technological changes in financial reporting and perhaps comprehensive changes in accounting standards such as the implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Accounting

Reference19 articles.

1. Assurance Services Executive Committee (ASEC) XBRL Assurance Task Force. 2009. Performing Agreed-Upon Procedures Engagements that Address the Completeness, Accuracy, or Consistency of XBRL-Tagged Data. Statement of Position 09-1. New York, NY: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Auditing Standards Board.

2. Bolgiano, M. P. (2008). XBRL US GAAP Taxonomies v1.0 Technical Guide. Washington, D.C.: XBRL US Inc.

3. The SEC's XBRL voluntary program on EDGAR: The case for quality assurance;Boritz;Current Issues in Auditing,2008

4. Assurance on XBRL-related documents: The case of United Technologies Corporation;Boritz;Journal of Information Systems,2009

5. Financial reporting in XBRL on the SEC's EDGAR System: A critique and evaluation;Debreceny;Journal of Information Systems,2005

Cited by 62 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3