The Effect of Past Performance and Task Type on Managers' Target Setting Decisions: An Experimental Investigation

Author:

Arnold Markus C.1,Artz Martin2,Tafkov Ivo D.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Bern

2. University of Münster

3. Georgia State University

Abstract

ABSTRACT We investigate how performance-to-target (exceeding versus missing prior target) and task type (ability-driven versus effort-driven) affect managers' target-setting decisions in a setting where a manager sets targets for multiple employees. To do so, we use an experiment that involves executives, who average more than 16 years of work experience. We predict and find stronger target adjustments when prior targets are exceeded than when they are missed, especially when tasks are ability-driven. We also predict and find targets are differentiated more between employees within a firm when tasks are ability-driven rather than effort-driven, but this effect is attenuated when prior targets are missed. As prior empirical findings are inconclusive in this area of research, we contribute to the literature by providing controlled experimental evidence about the asymmetric nature of target adjustments. Additionally, we identify an important factor affecting managers' target-setting decisions—task type—that has largely been neglected in prior work. JEL Classifications: M21; M41; M52.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting

Reference86 articles.

1. Algina, J., and OlejnikS. 1984. Implementing the Welch-James procedure with factorial designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement44 ( 1): 39– 48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164484441004

2. Anderson, S., Dekker H., and SedatoleK. 2010. An empirical examination of goals and performance-to-goal following the introduction of an incentive bonus plan with participative goalsetting. Management Science56 ( 1): 90– 109. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1088

3. Aranda, C., Arellano J., and DavilaA. 2014. Ratcheting and the role of relative target setting. The Accounting Review89 ( 4): 1197– 1226. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50733

4. Aranda, C., Arellano J., and DavilaA. 2017. Organizational learning in target setting. Academy of Management Journal60 ( 3): 1189– 1211. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0897

5. Arnold, M. C. 2015. The effect of superiors' exogenous constraints on budget negotiations. The Accounting Review90 ( 1): 31– 57. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50864

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3