How a Systems Perspective Improves Knowledge Acquisition and Performance in Analytical Procedures

Author:

Brewster Billy E.1

Affiliation:

1. The University of Texas at Arlington

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Auditors are required to understand dynamic business environments as part of the performance of analytical procedures. Prior evidence, though, suggests that auditors have difficulty understanding such environments. This study reports an experimental investigation of techniques that help auditors to identify incorrect management representations by developing expectations that are both accurate and adaptive to changing business conditions. My predictions suggest that analyzing a dynamic client environment through a systems perspective enhances information-processing ability, which then improves both evidence discrimination and the assimilation of new audit evidence. Results reveal that participants taking a holistic systems-based view of a client environment develop more coherently organized mental models that increase their likelihood of identifying management representations that are inconsistent with industry evidence. Furthermore, these participants more efficiently use their information-processing ability, thereby improving assimilation of newly learned evidence to understand how changing business conditions affect their initial expectations.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting

Reference63 articles.

1. Schema acquisition from a single example;Ahn;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,1992

2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2006. Understanding the Entity and Its Environment and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement. Statement on Auditing Standard No. 109. New York, NY:AICPA.

3. Development of a short form for the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test;Arthur;Educational and Psychological Measurement,1994

4. Baddeley A. 1998. Human Memory: Theory and Practice. Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon.

5. Bell T. B., Marrs F. O., Solomon I., and Thomas H. 1997. Auditing Organizations Through A Strategic Systems Lens: The KPMG Business Measurement Process. Montvale, NJ:KPMG LLP.

Cited by 54 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Public Accountability and Bureaucratic Discretion: Why do Internal Auditors Stretch the Boundaries of Their Role?;The American Review of Public Administration;2024-07-26

2. Public accountability and auditing: Why and when do state auditors conduct broad audits?;Public Administration;2024-06-24

3. Small firm auditing using the analytical procedures (APs) in a politically challenging context;International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management;2024-03-12

4. The psychology in auditing: Auditors' cognitive biases and how to mitigate them;Revija Kopaonicke skole prirodnog prava;2024

5. Can knowledge based systems be designed to counteract deskilling effects?;International Journal of Accounting Information Systems;2023-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3