Affiliation:
1. University of Luxembourg
2. University of Hamburg
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study introduces a new method for predicting cost elasticity with respect to changes in sales that incorporates cost asymmetry at the firm-year level. The new method is based on widely available factors that are expected to influence cost behavior. The new method is subject to fewer data restrictions than the method proposed by Weiss (2010). By extending the cost variability and cost stickiness (CVCS) model of Banker and Chen (2006), we find that incorporating firm-year-specific proxy measures for upward cost adjustment and cost asymmetry significantly enhances earnings forecasts. However, this improvement in forecast accuracy is not reflected in contemporaneous stock returns, pointing toward a partial understanding of cost behavior by capital markets. We further find that predicted cost stickiness is associated with lower analysts' forecast accuracy and a weaker effect of earnings surprises on market reactions, confirming the results reported in Weiss (2010) for his measure of cost asymmetry.
JEL Classifications: M41; G12.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference56 articles.
1. On the econometric testing of rationality-market efficiency;Abel;Review of Economics and Statistics,1983
2. Asymmetric Cost Behavior: A Life Cycle Analysis;Anderson,2016
3. Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”?;Anderson;Journal of Accounting Research,2003
4. Cost Stickiness and Cost Inertia: A Two-Driver Model of Asymmetric Cost Behavior;Anderson,2016
5. Cost behavior and fundamental analysis of SG&A costs;Anderson;Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance,2007
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献