Affiliation:
1. UNSW Sydney
2. The Chinese University of Hong Kong
3. The University of Texas at Dallas
Abstract
ABSTRACT
We examine whether aggregate cost stickiness predicts future macro-level unemployment rate. We incorporate aggregate cost stickiness into three different classes of forecasting models studied in prior literature, and demonstrate an improvement in forecasting performance for all three models. For example, when adding cost stickiness to an OLS regression that includes a battery of macroeconomic indicators and control variables, we find that a one-standard-deviation-higher cost stickiness in recent quarters is followed by a 0.23 to 0.26 percentage point lower unemployment rate in the current and following quarter. In out-of-sample tests, we find significant reductions in the root mean squared errors upon incorporation of cost stickiness for all three models. Additional tests suggest that professional macro forecasters, particularly those employed in nonfinancial industries, do not fully incorporate the information contained in cost stickiness. Finally, we find a stronger predictive power of cost stickiness toward the end of recessionary periods; we also assess cross-sectional variation of this predictive ability.
JEL Classifications: M41; E24; J60.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference70 articles.
1. Allison, P. A.
1999. Multiple Regression: A Primer. 1st edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press/Sage Publications.
2. Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”?;Anderson;Journal of Accounting Research,2003
3. Cost behavior and fundamental analysis of SGA costs;Anderson;Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance,2007
4. Baker
S.,
N. Bloom, and S. Davis.
2014. Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty. Working paper, Stanford University.
5. Cost stickiness and core competency: A note;Balakrishnan;Contemporary Accounting Research,2008
Cited by
54 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献