Does the U.S. Market Reward Foreign Firms and Domestic Firms Differently? Evidence from Meeting-or-Beating Earnings Expectations

Author:

Bannister Jennifer1,Ho Li-Chin Jennifer2ORCID,Song Xiaoxiao3

Affiliation:

1. University of Dallas

2. The University of Texas at Arlington

3. Southern Illinois University Edwardsville

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis paper investigates whether the U.S. market rewards cross-listed foreign firms and domestic firms differently when they meet or beat earnings expectations (MBE). Using 1,800 matched pairs of foreign firms and domestic firms from year 2005 to 2014, we find that (1) the MBE premium is discounted for foreign firms compared to U.S. domestic firms, (2) although the reward for MBE is discounted for foreign firms, they suffer a similar penalty as domestic firms when they miss expectations, (3) foreign firms from countries with strong legal enforcement and full or substantial IFRS adoption enjoy an MBE premium similar to that of domestic firms, while foreign firms from countries with weak legal enforcement and without full or substantial IFRS adoption experience a discounted MBE premium, and (4) both language difference and culture distance appear to account for the differential MBE premium between foreign firms and domestic firms as well.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Accounting,Business and International Management

Reference92 articles.

1. Information costs and home bias: An analysis of U.S. holdings of foreign equities;Ahearne;Journal of International Economics,2004

2. Asset pricing and dual listing on foreign capital markets: A note;Alexander;The Journal of Finance,1987

3. Evaluating concepts-based vs. rules-based approaches to standard setting;American Accounting Association (AAA) Financial Accounting Standards Committee (FASC);Accounting Horizons,2003

4. Domestic accounting standards, international accounting standards, and the predictability of earnings;Ashbaugh;Journal of Accounting Research,2001

5. The liability of foreignness in international equity investments: Evidence from the U.S. stock market;Baik;Journal of International Business Studies,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3