Investor Sentiment and Audit Opinion Shopping

Author:

Amin Keval1ORCID,Eshleman Dan2ORCID,Guo Peng2

Affiliation:

1. Stony Brook University, SUNY

2. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Abstract

SUMMARY The purpose of this study is to examine whether investor sentiment influences clients' propensity to engage in audit opinion shopping. Using the opinion shopping framework of Lennox (2000), we document that internal control opinion shopping is more prevalent when investor sentiment is high. This effect is concentrated among firms with low institutional ownership. We also find that clients are more likely to undertake downward switches (i.e., Big 4 to non-Big 4 auditor) when sentiment is high. Additional tests reveal that clients who engage in opinion shopping during high sentiment periods have a higher risk of material restatements and higher audit fees. As well, the market-penalty associated with opinion shopping is reduced when sentiment is high. Overall, the results suggest that firms' opinion shopping behavior during high sentiment periods is more prevalent and opportunistic. Data Availability: Data are available from public sources cited in the text.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting

Reference103 articles.

1. Ai, C., and NortonE. C. 2003. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters80 ( 1): 123– 129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00032-6

2. Ali, A., and GurunU. G. 2009. Investor sentiment, accruals anomaly, and accruals management. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance24 ( 3): 415– 431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0902400305

3. Amin, K., and HarrisE. 2017. Nonprofit stakeholder response to going-concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance32 ( 3): 329– 349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X15604989

4. Amin, K., and HarrisE. 2020. The effect of investor sentiment on nonprofit donations. Journal of Business Ethics(forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04646-7

5. Amin, K., Eshleman J. D., and FengC. 2018. The effect of the SEC's XBRL mandate on audit report lags. Accounting Horizons32 ( 1): 1– 27. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51823

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3