The Extent of Earnings Management in the U.S. and Germany

Author:

Glaum Martin1,Lichtblau Karl2,Lindemann Jens1

Affiliation:

1. University of Giessen.

2. Institut der Deutschen Wirtschaft, Cologne.

Abstract

This paper compares the extent to which U.S. and German companies manage their earnings in order to exceed earnings thresholds. Following Burgstahler and Dichev (1997), we analyze the distribution of earnings to discover whether U.S. and German firms have managed reported earnings in order to avoid losses, decreases in earnings, or earnings below the forecasts of analysts. The data for our tests have been taken from the Worldscope and the Osiris databases. The sample comprises 38,714 firm-year observations for U.S. companies and 3,524 firm-year observations for German companies for the years 1991 to 2000. Given the pronounced differences between the institutional environments of U.S. and German firms, we expect the extent of thresholdoriented earnings management to differ between the two countries. However, differences between the extent of earnings management to avoid losses and earnings decreases in the U.S. and in Germany are not statistically significant. By contrast, earnings management in order to avoid negative earnings surprises appears to be more prevalent in the U.S. than in Germany. This study also contributes to the literature by making methodological advances. We introduce a measure of the asymmetry of distributions around thresholds, which allows us to make statistically meaningful comparisons across different distributions. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the measurement of earnings management is sensitive to the choice of the interval width. Additionally, we show that firms' propensity to manage earnings depends on firm characteristics such as size, leverage, and growth.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Accounting,Business and International Management

Cited by 39 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3