Principal Component Analysis and Factor Analysis in Accounting Research

Author:

Allee Kristian D.1ORCID,Do Chuong2ORCID,Raymundo Fellipe G.1

Affiliation:

1. University of Arkansas

2. University of Nevada, Reno

Abstract

ABSTRACT Principal component analysis (PCA) and factor analysis (FA) are both variable reduction techniques used to represent a set of observed variables in terms of a smaller number of variables. While both PCA and FA are similar along several dimensions (e.g., extraction of common components/factors), researchers often fail to recognize that these techniques are designed to achieve different goals and can produce significantly different results. We conduct a comprehensive review of the use of PCA and FA in accounting research. We offer simple guidelines on how to program PCA and FA in SAS/Stata and emphasize the importance of the implementation techniques as well as the disclosure choices made when utilizing these methodologies. Furthermore, we present a few intuitive, practical examples highlighting the unique differences between the techniques. Finally, we provide some recommendations, observations, notes, and citations for researchers considering using these procedures in future research. Data Availability: The data used in this paper are publicly available from the sources indicated in the text. JEL Classifications: C38; C88; M41.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

General Medicine

Reference74 articles.

1. Ali, A. , LiN., and ZhangW.. 2019. Restrictions on managers' outside employment opportunities and asymmetric disclosure of bad versus good news. The Accounting Review94 (5): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52314

2. Alin, A . 2010. Multicollinearity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics2 (3): 370–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.84

3. Arrindell, W. A. , and van der EndeJ.. 1985. An empirical test of the utility of the observations-to- variables ratio in factor and component analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement9 (2): 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168500900205

4. Bamber, L. S. , and CheonY. S.. 1998. Discretionary management earnings forecasts: Antecedents and outcomes associated with forecast venue and forecast specificity choices. Journal of Accounting Research36 (2): 167–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491473

5. Bartlett, M. S . 1951. The effect of standardization on a Chi-square approximation in factor analysis. Biometrika38: 3– 4, 337–344.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3