Author:
Atwood T. J.,Reynolds J. Kenneth
Abstract
ABSTRACT: We examine the pricing of realized tax benefits from net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards across income statement presentations. During the period 1987 through 1992, firms adopting SFAS No. 96 reported these tax benefits as part of income before extraordinary items (via a reduced provision for income tax expense), while non-adopting firms reported these benefits as extraordinary income items under APB No. 11. We provide evidence that NOL tax benefits were priced rationally when reported as extraordinary income items under APB No. 11; however, NOL tax benefits were overpriced, relative to their one-year-ahead persistence, when included in income before extraordinary items under SFAS No. 96. Our results suggest that the rational pricing of income tax information is affected by its presentation in the income statement, despite the clear reporting of sufficient additional details in the footnotes. Our findings provide support for the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s tentative decision to report income taxes in a separate section of the income statement.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Reference45 articles.
1. Recognition versus disclosure in the oil and gas industry;Aboody;Journal of Accounting Research,1996
2. Accounting Principles Board (APB).
1967. Accounting for Income Taxes. Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 11. Stamford, CT:FASB.
3. The market valuation of accounting information: The case of postretirement benefits other than pensions;Amir;The Accounting Review,1993
4. The valuation of deferred taxes;Amir;Contemporary Accounting Research,1997
5. Analysts’ interpretation and investors’ valuation of tax carryforwards;Amir;Contemporary Accounting Research,1999
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献