Affiliation:
1. Monash University
2. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study examines the performance target response to CEO overconfidence. Using unique hand-collected data on the annual bonus targets of Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 1500 firms, we find that boards ratchet targets more aggressively and apply greater ratcheting asymmetry for overconfident CEOs than for non-overconfident CEOs. These findings are robust to a battery of sensitivity tests. We also provide evidence that the increase in target ratcheting for overconfident CEOs is particularly more pronounced in firms with strong monitoring environments. Collectively, our findings suggest that boards actively consider CEOs’ overconfidence when setting performance targets, providing new insight into the importance of CEOs’ personal traits with respect to the incentive effects of performance target revisions.
JEL Classification: G34; J33; M52.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Reference87 articles.
1. Critique on the “manager effects” research and implications for management accounting research;Abernethy,;Journal of Management Accounting Research,2019
2. The influence of CEO power on compensation contract design;Abernethy,;The Accounting Review,2015
3. Altruism, social norms, and incentive contract design;Abernethy,;Review of Accounting Studies,2023
4. Managerial overconfidence and accounting conservatism;Ahmed,;Journal of Accounting Research,2013
5. Ratcheting and the role of relative target setting;Aranda,;The Accounting Review,2014