Earnings-Announcement Narrative and Investor Judgment

Author:

Henry Elaine1,Peytcheva Marietta2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Stevens Institute of Technology

2. Lehigh University

Abstract

SYNOPSIS This study examines how emphasis framing in narrative disclosures, and the investor characteristics of numeracy and persuadability, affect investors' ability to discriminate between firms' better and worse financial performance. In an experiment with 264 participants from the general population, we manipulate emphasis framing in earnings announcement narratives as neutral, consistent, or inconsistent with the firm's performance. We find that investors are better able to distinguish between good and poor firm performance when the accompanying disclosure emphasizes information that is consistent with the firm's performance. Further, persuadability reduces, but numeracy increases, investors' ability to distinguish between good and poor performance. However, our results also indicate that the inclusion of biased numerical information in narrative disclosures may have a greater negative effect on higher numerates than on lower numerates, consistent with theory suggesting that more numerate individuals tend to focus on and draw affective meaning from numbers. JEL Classifications: M41.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Accounting

Reference85 articles.

1. Disclosure readability and the sensitivity of investors' valuation judgments to outside information;Asay;The Accounting Review,2017

2. Do Features that Associate Managers with a Message Magnify Investors' Reactions to Narrative Disclosures?;Asay,2014

3. Bauguess, S. W. 2016. Has Big Data Made Us Lazy?Speech at the Midwest Region Meeting, American Accounting Association, Chicago, IL, October 21. Available at: https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/bauguess-american-accounting-association-102116.html

4. Bazerman, M. H. 2002. Judgment in Managerial Decision Making. 5th edition. New York, NY: John Wiley.

5. Who trades on pro forma earnings information?;Bhattacharya;The Accounting Review,2007

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3