Affiliation:
1. The University of Texas at Austin
2. University of Pennsylvania
3. Texas A&M University
Abstract
ABSTRACT: We investigate why firms choose to evaluate a tax department as a profit center (“contributor to the bottom line”) as opposed to as a cost center and the association between this choice and effective tax rates (ETRs). Using data from a confidential survey taken in 1999 of Chief Financial Officers, we develop and test a theory for choosing between these two methods of evaluating a tax department. We find that the likelihood of evaluating the tax department as a profit center is increasing in firm decentralization characteristics and tax-planning opportunities. We then employ instrumental variables to investigate whether evaluating a tax department as a profit center provides an effective incentive for the tax department to contribute to net income through lower ETRs. We find that our instrument for profit center firms is associated with significantly lower ETRs than cost center firms.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference53 articles.
1. The incentives for tax planning;Armstrong,2009
2. Earnings management strategies and the trade-off between tax benefits and detection risk: To conform or not to conform?;Badertscher;The Accounting Review,2009
3. The structure of Silicon Valley start-ups;Bankman;UCLA Law Review, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law,1994
4. An alternative interpretation of the discontinuity in earnings distributions;Beaver;Review of Accounting Studies,2007
5. Belsley
D. A.,
Kuh
E. Q., and
Welsch
R. E.
1980. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons.
Cited by
280 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献