Affiliation:
1. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Abstract
ABSTRACT
We examine how product market competition affects the disclosure of innovation. Theory posits that product market competition can cause firms to increase their disclosure of innovation to deter product market competitors. Consistent with this reasoning, we find that patent applicants in more competitive industries voluntarily accelerate their patent disclosures, which are credibly disclosed via the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Our inferences are robust to using changes in industry-level import tariffs as sources of plausibly exogenous variation in product market competition in difference-in-differences designs. Consistent with patent disclosure deterring product market competitors, we find that timelier patent disclosures are more strongly associated with declines in the similarity of competitors' products than are less timely patent disclosures. In total, our results suggest that product market competition increases patent disclosure timeliness, which is consistent with firms using the disclosure of innovation to deter product market competition.
JEL Classifications: D23; G38; O30; O31; O33; O34; O38.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference89 articles.
1. Aboody,
D.,
and
LevB.
2000.
Information asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains.
The Journal of Finance55(6):
2747–
2766.
https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00305
2. Ali,
A.,
Klasa
S.,
and
YeungE.
2014.
Industry concentration and corporate disclosure policy.
Journal of Accounting and Economics58:
240–
264.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.08.004
3. Altman,
S.,
Brown
H. C.,
Curl
R. F.,
Elion
G.,
Friedman
J.,
Friedman
M.,
Harsanyi
J. C.,
Hauptman
H.,
Herschbach
D.,
Hoffman
R.,
Kendall
H.,
Khorana
H. G.,
Lee
D. M.,
Miller
M.,
Modigliani
F.,
Molina
M.,
Nathans
D.,
North
D.,
Samuelson
P.,
Sharpe
W.,
Shull
C.,
Simon
H. A.,
Smalley
R.,
Solow
R.,
and
TobinJ.
1999.
An open letter to the U.S. Senate. Available at: https://eagleforum.org/patent/nobel_letter.html
4. Anton,
J. J.,
and
YaoD. A.
2004.
Little patents and big secrets: Managing intellectual property.
RAND Journal of Economics35:
1.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1593727
5. Armstrong,
C. S.,
Glaeser
S.,
and
HuangS.
2018.
Controllability of risk and the design of incentive-compensation contracts.
Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.
Cited by
55 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献