Affiliation:
1. California State University, Fullerton
2. Virginia Commonwealth University
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Recent advances in technology have increased the accessibility and ease in using eye-tracking as a research tool. These advances have the potential to benefit behavioral accounting researchers' understanding of the cognitive processes underlying individuals' judgments, decisions, and behaviors. However, despite its potential and wide use in other disciplines, few behavioral accounting studies use eye-tracking. The purpose of this paper is to familiarize accounting researchers with eye-tracking, including its advantages and limitations as a research tool. We start by providing an overview of eye-tracking and discussing essential terms and useful metrics, as well as the psychological constructs they proxy. We then summarize eye-tracking research across research domains, review accounting studies that use eye-tracking, and identify future research directions across accounting topics. Finally, we provide an instructional resource to guide those researchers interested in using eye-tracking, including important considerations at each stage of the study.
JEL Classifications: M41; C91.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Accounting
Reference132 articles.
1. Under weighting of private information by top analysts;Aharoni;Journal of Accounting Research,2017
2. Testing Process Theories in Accounting Experiments;American Accounting Association (AAA),2018
3. Eye movements do not reflect retrieval processes: Limits of the eye-mind hypothesis;Anderson;Psychological Science,2004
4. Andiola, L. M., J. C.Bedard, and C. T.Hux.
2017. Writing a literature review in behavioral accounting research. In The Routledge Companion to Behavioral Accounting Research, edited byT.Libby and L.Thorne, 473–485. New York, NY: Routledge.
5. Andiola, L. M., A. G.Brink, E. J.Lynch, and J.Ferguson.
2019. Client Data Files and Auditor Skepticism: How do “Dirty Files” Influence Auditors' Skeptical Judgments and Actions? Working paper, Virginia Commonwealth University and California State University–Fullerton. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3395571 (last accessed September 20, 2019).
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献