If Eyes are the Window to Our Soul, What Role does Eye-Tracking Play in Accounting Research?

Author:

Lynch Edward J.1,Andiola Lindsay M.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. California State University, Fullerton

2. Virginia Commonwealth University

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent advances in technology have increased the accessibility and ease in using eye-tracking as a research tool. These advances have the potential to benefit behavioral accounting researchers' understanding of the cognitive processes underlying individuals' judgments, decisions, and behaviors. However, despite its potential and wide use in other disciplines, few behavioral accounting studies use eye-tracking. The purpose of this paper is to familiarize accounting researchers with eye-tracking, including its advantages and limitations as a research tool. We start by providing an overview of eye-tracking and discussing essential terms and useful metrics, as well as the psychological constructs they proxy. We then summarize eye-tracking research across research domains, review accounting studies that use eye-tracking, and identify future research directions across accounting topics. Finally, we provide an instructional resource to guide those researchers interested in using eye-tracking, including important considerations at each stage of the study. JEL Classifications: M41; C91.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Accounting

Reference132 articles.

1. Under weighting of private information by top analysts;Aharoni;Journal of Accounting Research,2017

2. Testing Process Theories in Accounting Experiments;American Accounting Association (AAA),2018

3. Eye movements do not reflect retrieval processes: Limits of the eye-mind hypothesis;Anderson;Psychological Science,2004

4. Andiola, L. M., J. C.Bedard, and C. T.Hux. 2017. Writing a literature review in behavioral accounting research. In The Routledge Companion to Behavioral Accounting Research, edited byT.Libby and L.Thorne, 473–485. New York, NY: Routledge.

5. Andiola, L. M., A. G.Brink, E. J.Lynch, and J.Ferguson. 2019. Client Data Files and Auditor Skepticism: How do “Dirty Files” Influence Auditors' Skeptical Judgments and Actions? Working paper, Virginia Commonwealth University and California State University–Fullerton. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3395571 (last accessed September 20, 2019).

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3