The Impact of Reported Cybersecurity Breaches on Firm Innovation

Author:

He Chris Zhijian1,Frost Tracie1,Pinsker Robert E.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Florida Atlantic University

Abstract

ABSTRACT Many firms cite cyber risk as a primary risk factor due to the increase in cybersecurity breach (CSB) incidents. Existing research focuses on the negative, short-term impacts from CSBs, but the longer-term impact is still unknown. Our study investigates firms' levels of innovation following a CSB as an important determinant of firm growth and profitability. Examining reported breaches from 2005–2014, we find a 10 percent decline in research and development spending in the year following a CSB. Further investigation indicates that firms for which R&D is not the primary business model drive the results. We also provide evidence of a decrease in patents two years after a breach, an increase in cash holdings in the year after the breach, and a decrease in investment efficiency four years following the breach. Our aggregate results suggest that CSBs are associated with future strategic decisions involving firm-level innovation and investment decisions. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Information Systems and Management,Human-Computer Interaction,Accounting,Information Systems,Software,Management Information Systems

Reference78 articles.

1. Accenture Finance and Risk Services. 2016. The convergence of operational risk and cyber security. Available at: https://www.accenture.com/t20170803T055319Z__w__/us-en/_acnmedia/PDF-7/Accenture-Cyber-Risk-Convergence-Of-Operational-Risk-And-Cyber-Security.pdf

2. Acquisti A., Friedman A., and TelangR. 2006. Is there a cost to privacy breaches? An event study. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220268931_Is_There_a_Cost_to_Privacy_Breaches_An_Event_Study

3. Acs, Z. J., and AudretschD. B. 1988. Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. The American Economic Review78 (4): 678–690.

4. Akerlof, G. 1970. The market for lemons: Qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics84 (3): 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431

5. Almeida, H., Campello M., and WeisbachM. S. 2004. The cash flow sensitivity of cash. The Journal of Finance59 (4): 1777–1804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00679.x

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Cybersecurity data breaches and internal control;International Review of Financial Analysis;2024-05

2. La maturité cyber au prisme de la communication extra-financière : une analyse des entreprises du CAC 40;Revue Française de Gestion Industrielle;2024-04-30

3. Navigating the Digital Frontier: Emerging Trends in Digital Innovation Management for 2023 and Beyond;International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management;2024-03-16

4. Does cybersecurity risk stifle corporate innovation activities?;International Review of Financial Analysis;2024-01

5. Corporate Responses to Generative AI: Early Evidence from Conference Calls;SSRN Electronic Journal;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3