Comments by the Auditing Standards Committee of the Auditing Section of the American Accounting Association on the Discussion Paper: Fraud and Going Concern in an Audit of Financial Statements: Exploring the Differences between Public Perceptions about the Role of the Auditor and the Auditor's Responsibilities in a Financial Statement Audit

Author:

Schaefer Tammie J.ORCID,Brown Veena L.ORCID,Ege Matthew S.ORCID,Harding Noel,Hermanson Dana R.,Higgs Julia L.,Jenkins J. GregoryORCID,Smith Kecia WilliamsORCID

Abstract

SUMMARY We commend the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (the Board) on its efforts to determine “whether the auditing standards related to fraud and going concern need to be updated to reflect the rapidly evolving external reporting landscape.” We especially commend the Board on the timeliness of the call for input into these issues in that there is sufficient time to conduct research to further inform questions raised in the Discussion Paper and the questions that will inevitably arise as deliberations continue and progress is made on the project. We note below insights from the extant research literature as they relate to the questions posed in the Discussion Paper, but there remain many unanswered questions. We believe that many members of the Auditing Section of the American Accounting Association stand ready to work with the Board and other stakeholders to inform deliberations in this area. Data Availability: Information about and access to the Discussion Paper are available at: https://www.iaasb.org/publications/fraud-and-going-concern-audit-financial-statements.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Accounting

Reference111 articles.

1. Alleyne, P., and Howard M. 2005. An exploratory study of auditors' responsibility for fraud detection in Barbados. Managerial Auditing Journal 20 ( 3): 284– 303. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900510585618

2. Amer, T., Hackenbrack K., and Nelson M. 1994. Between-auditor differences in the interpretation of probability phrases. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 13 ( 1): 126– 136.

3. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2002. AU-C 240. Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. SAS No. 99. New York, NY: AICPA.

4. Anti-Fraud Collaboration. 2021. Mitigating the Risk of Common Fraud Schemes: Insights from SEC Enforcement Actions. Washington, DC: Anti-Fraud Collaboration.

5. Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins D. W., Kinney, W. R. Jr., and LaFond R. 2008. The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies and their remediation on accrual quality. The Accounting Review 83 ( 1): 217– 250. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.217

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3