Comments of the Auditing Standards Committee of the Auditing Section of the American Accounting Association on Proposed Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS), Audit Evidence

Author:

Brown Veena LooknananORCID,Dickins DeniseORCID,Hermanson Dana R.ORCID,Higgs Julia L.ORCID,Jenkins J. GregoryORCID,Nolder Christine,Schaefer Tammie J.,Smith Kecia WilliamsORCID

Abstract

SUMMARY On June 20, 2019, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Auditing Standards Board (the Board or ASB) issued a request for comment on its Exposure Draft, Proposed Statement on Auditing Standards, Audit Evidence. Enhancements in the proposed SAS include the use of emerging technologies by both preparers and auditors, audit data analytics, the application of professional skepticism, and the expanding use of external information sources as audit evidence. The comment period ended on September 18, 2019. This commentary summarizes the participating committee members' views on selected questions posed by the ASB. Questions not addressed by the committee are listed at the end of this manuscript. Data Availability: Proposed Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS), Audit Evidence, including questions for respondents, is available at: https://www.aicpa.org/content/dam/aicpa/research/exposuredrafts/accountingandauditing/downloadabledocuments/20190620a/20190620a-ed-sas-audit-evidence.pdf

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Accounting

Reference15 articles.

1. Aldhizer, G. R., and CashellJ. D. 2006. Automating the confirmation process: How to enhance audit effectiveness and efficiency. The CPA Journal76 ( 4): 28– 32.

2. Alliott Group. 2017. Alliott Group worldwide conference highlights how mid-market firms can win in rapidly changing professional services market. Available at: https://www.alliottgroup.net/international-alliance-law-accounting-firms-news/2017-worldwide-conference-report/

3. Boland, C. M., Daugherty B. E., and DickinsD. 2019. Evidence of the relationship between PCAOB inspection outcomes and the use of structured audit technologies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory38 ( 2): 57– 77. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-52214

4. Brazel, J. and SchaeferT. 2017. Research insights—Auditor professional skepticism part II: Mindset, prompts, and environmental and contextual factors. Available at: https://www.ifac.org/global-knowledge-gateway/audit-assurance/discussion/research-insights-auditor-professional-0

5. Caster, P., Elder R. J., and JanvrinD. J. 2008. A summary of research and enforcement release evidence on confirmation use and effectiveness. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory27 ( 2): 253– 279. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2008.27.2.253

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Empirical research frameworks in a changing world: The case of audit data analytics;Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation;2023-06

2. Artificial Intelligence and Auditing;Revolutionizing Business Practices Through Artificial Intelligence and Data-Rich Environments;2022-06-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3